>>2155817
Could be, indeed.
I am still a bit of a newfag here, but does Q only use minute timestamps (which is more logical imho)? "Seconds" timestamps are hard to get, especially if the sites server is slow or your own network sucks.
>>2155817
Could be, indeed.
I am still a bit of a newfag here, but does Q only use minute timestamps (which is more logical imho)? "Seconds" timestamps are hard to get, especially if the sites server is slow or your own network sucks.