>>21571466 lb

>(other mags labeled [Harris' father] as "Marxist")

"Kamala Harris says her dad taught her to be fearless, but he’s been markedly absent from her public rise

"Family is at the forefront of Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign, and she speaks frequently and fondly of her late mother’s influence – but rarely is there mention of her father. A “Marxist” economics professor who left Jamaica for UC Berkeley, Donald J Harris has said little about his daughter during her meteoric rise – other than to scold her, writes Sheila Flynn.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/kamala-harris-father-marxist-election-debate-b2610585.html

___

"Revisiting the work of Donald Harris, father of Kamala

"The combative Marxist economist focused on questions related to growth"

https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2024/07/25/revisiting-the-work-of-donald-harris-father-of-kamala

_____

One post-debate commentator said:

"Trump’s claim stems from an article in a 1976 issue of The Stanford Daily,* where he was deemed a 'Marxist' scholar from an opposition party after Stanford granted him tenure because he was 'too charismatic, a pied piper leading students astray from neo-Classical economics.'"

• 1976 Standford Daily reference: https://archives.stanforddaily.com/1976/11/03?page=4&section=MODSMD_ARTICLE11

https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/is-kamala-harris-a-marxist-just-like-her-father-a-look-into-trumps-statement-on-donald-j-harris/

>>21571717

If that is a baby boy, and not Kamala, as anon in referenced post suggested, that could be very interesting because that photo also presents "her father" (if that is him behind the shades holding that baby) with a MUCH darker complexion than any other photo of her father.

I wonder why? Hmmmmm.

If

NOT her as the baby but rather a boy, and

NOT him as the "father" of the "little Kamala"/boy baby?

THEN WHY THE HOAX?

>>21571761

>>21571717

Here's a photo, same outfit on child but w/her mom. CNN labels it as Kamala.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/08/politics/gallery/kamala-harris/index.html

But the shade on the man identified as her "dad," holding her, is nonetheless much of a much darker complexion than any other picture of them that is typically available.

It doesn't matter to Trump or anon.

But if it is her dad, and his complexion is being darkened by someone in her camp, then it matters to those doing the darkening. Why? Perhaps to promote a storyline that is misleading? For political purposes?

[Aside, his Wikipedia page had a lot of references to his Indian heritage, like many in Jamaica, which were recently deleted in favor of simply the Jamaican origin.]

>>21571976

Kamala's half sister, Maya, was often referred to as her half-sister - until it was apparently scrubbed from the Internet.

Wonder if this is a young Maya with her father (which, under this theory, would not be Donald Harris), and not Kamala with her father (Donald Harris), as claimed by CNN?

Urgent!!!

If Kamala is not Constitutionally-qualified for the Office of the Presidency, as so many have opined, whose job is it to knock her off the ballot, and when?

Who has standing?

Dr. Eastman said she may not qualify as an anchor baby under the 14th Amendment even if anchor babies - which she may not qualify as - could become the type of citizen ("natural born") required by Article II (which has been interpreted to mean "with no allegiance to any other country" (which both of Kamala's parents apparently had to their respective countries of origin, and by extension, so did she - when born).

Dr. Eastman said that if her parents were in the U.S. with no intention to stay permanently when she was born, Kamala could NOT be a 14th Amendment anchor baby and instead would have to become naturalized, if she wanted U.S. citizenship, after she returned to the States from her youth spent in Canada.

No evidence has been presented that she ever went through the naturalization process to become a citizen and, in any event, naturalized citizens are not "natural born" - so cannot become President under Article II.

So WHO is responsible for enforcing Article II of the Constitution and vetting this candidate?

There is a reason she is being slid in the back door.

This is a very slippery slope.

Any anchor baby - with allegiances by birth anywhere else, including China - they may argue, are eligible to run for President if "natural-born" citizens, as that term is meant under Article II, do not establish a precedent now, and instead allow our apparently-on-this-front ASLEEP AT THE WHEEL EXECUTIVE, CONGRESSIONAL, AND JUDICIAL REPRESENTATIVES to ignore the requirements set forth in the Constitution with respect to the qualifications to become President of these great United States.

ANYONE?!?!

https://www.newsweek.com/some-questions-kamala-harris-about-eligibility-opinion-1524483