>>2211112

One of your infographics (the Orange Hillary Clinton one) appears to have a text box that has been cut off and needs to be rectified.

It reads:

"Clinton State Dept. approved transfer of 20 percent of U.S. Uranium to Russian government, as Clinton Foundation took in $145 million in donations from investors of"

You can make more space for it by shortening the following:

percent -%

government -gov.

(or Russian government -Russia)

$145 million -$145m

On another text box:

"Clinton ally aided the wife of an FBI agent"

I strongly advise naming the people (the ally, the wife, the FBI agent) and giving specifics. No specifics means it can be dismissed as vague and unsubstantiated. Even a simple surname will suffice. It also aids people doing credibility checks to find what you're referring to.

Even if common knowledge now, in a year or so's time when damage control kicks in, it will be buried and harder to find.

>>2203192

Just an FYI, I'd advise being wary of 'YourNewsWire'. It often takes other people's articles without accreditation and then buries disinfo articles amongst it's offerings. In my strong estimation it's a misinformation outlet, mixing truth and outright lie in order to discredit the former with the latter.

A good practice is to literal-string search parts of the articles on a search engine like searx.me and just double-check it has backing somewhere. You'll often find the original article where it's been pulled from. It's how I originally discovered some of the articles were bogus - there were no other sources talking about it.