>>21759

Perhaps the message at this point was simply confirmation of how it works so we will be ready for it in future?

>>21829

You must be new here. There is no safe space here for you.

If you are offended so easily by words then this isn't the place for you.

>>21848

>(You)

Maybe it's for us to be ready for a Q drop later todaythen? Or an order for Q to do X.

>>21897

How do you know that?

>>21927

Got a link to that one?

If it wasn't said on Q's board then it can't be verified unless it had Q's trip.

>>22073

There's no proof JA is free, just speculation.

>>22115

QPEG = Q Post Example

>>22149

All that is proof of is that the Navy tweeted his name and then deleted it.

>>22149

All that is proof of is that the Navy tweeted his name and then deleted it.

>>22362

>(You)

I think you don't know how to distinguish between evidence and proof.

Proof would be when Assange publicly shows himself to be elsewhere than the Embassy. Anything else is just speculation.

>>22500

No, it isn't because judges and jury's can be biased and bought off.

>>22550

I've heard about that one from a few people and have it somewhere. Just haven't got round to reading it yet.