Anonymous ID: 35818d Jan. 11, 2018, 9:01 a.m. No.21904   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1914 >>2170

>>21825

^^^^^^ Anon is right…

 

Q posted on Chans because he knew we despise political correctness.

(Proven by the lampshade Kike and such… )

 

Anons here are not scared of anything, we tell it like it is.

Q wanted us to spread and be interested in learning the truth, and damn naked truth is what you get here.

Not necessarily because we are smart, sometimes we be dumb as hell and fly off in strange directions, but it's a collective personality thing most anons here are proud of.

 

We are also (no kike pun intended here) 'the chosen ones' to explain to fellow normies for years to come about what happened while they were sleeping…

Anonymous ID: 35818d Jan. 11, 2018, 9:10 a.m. No.21971   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21949

I don't feel comfy about the vote either, but here is a thought of comfort…

 

The cabal has been in power for hundreds of years before "intelligence" in it's modern form. This modern intelligence is what "toppled" the cabal.

So if proper oversight becomes of it and measures are put in place that cannot be circumvented then I will change my opinion.

 

Just to be clear, I am against any person or agency having the power to "rule the world", so whatever has to happen to prevent that, I am listening…

Anonymous ID: 35818d Jan. 11, 2018, 9:20 a.m. No.22037   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21967

I hope to see the 24hr perpwalk channel too.

 

But its possible the "big week" was the torpedo turning at hillary. That's actually yuuge, but not to "the anons" who know so much more "should be" happening.

 

And also, if things go smooth without shock and awe, then let it. No need to shock and awe until it's OVER - then there is no need to scale back or slow down operations based on public freakout factor.

Plus: no news about it certainly drives the remaining clovvns crazy!

 

I have faith however.

Enough things are happening to confirm it is happening.

(people falling, resigning, etc)

Anonymous ID: 35818d Jan. 11, 2018, 10:02 a.m. No.22315   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2325 >>2358

>>22137

Yes. in fact I remember hearing that TESTING for HIV only tests for ANTIBODIES.

Is like testing for Chicken Pox by looking for Antibodies.

Meaning if you have Chicken Pox Antibodies, then your immune system has developed a response to it. Does NOT indicate if you are infected, only that you were at one time exposed.

This test however shows positive if you "have exposure" to something you probably defeated long ago.

 

Now introduce a drug to combat "chicken pox" when you do not actively have it.

Then you get an immune system crash…

THUS AIDS.

 

Yes, the drug to treat HIV gives you AIDS.

 

Hope that explains why.

Anonymous ID: 35818d Jan. 11, 2018, 10:12 a.m. No.22394   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2403

>>22358

Not BS.

First thing that popped up in search on even clown infested google….

 

Pasted at bottom.

 

(So if you test for antigen, and treat for infection you kill your immune system!)

 

"HIV screening tests detect the HIV antigen (p24) and/or HIV antibodies produced in response to an HIV infection in the blood. Some tests detect HIV antibody in oral fluid. … During the first few weeks of infection, the amount of virus (viral load) and the p24 antigen level in the blood can be quite high"

 

———

 

It is VERY relevant because of being another deception involving Loop Capitol.

 

(that should be obvious!)

Anonymous ID: 35818d Jan. 11, 2018, 10:28 a.m. No.22480   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2531

>>22444

I am in medical engineering, not viral, but irrelevant because mainstream science lectures will only support mainstream science and the money that supports them (ie: loop capital).

 

I (as anyone should be able to) understand that if you introduce an attack against an immune system then you may break it.

 

Look closely at the test for HIV. Closely. Then you understand if you have "knowledge within".

 

Meanwhile, enough. Getting nowhere.

Anonymous ID: 35818d Jan. 11, 2018, 10:39 a.m. No.22563   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22536

I disagree.

The DEFCON message was a name of the Consumer Electronics Vegas Show that went dark unexpectedly.

There is a connection, we just have not figured it out.

 

And if I on Q-Team, I probably would have made the same mistake and assumed that no one would really think we were at DefenseCondition 1 (whereas missiles would be airborne at the moment).

 

I blame the anons for that debacle. We should have known better.

Anonymous ID: 35818d Jan. 11, 2018, 10:43 a.m. No.22582   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22570

Has anyone ever dissected the ECM's from a few auto to determine if they contain any explosives or anything? I mean- once potted and washed, no dog would sniff it, and assemblers would not know a capacitor from a cube of C4…

At this point. I wonder why these automakers are always so quick to appear at Bilderberg and shit.