Anonymous ID: 675dd1 July 15, 2018, 1:13 a.m. No.2161425   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1442 >>1854 >>2145 >>2149

>>2161366 (LB)

First link is about that missile launch photo that Q posted with "Think hack". Anon says that it's unlikely that USN sailors willfully launched a nuke missile and thinks the sub was hacked by (((them))).

Personally I'm skeptical of this interpretation. They are not setup in any way that could be hacked remotely. And there are a lot of steps involved in launching a missile from under water. If they lost helm control and saw their sub start going through the launch procedure that they have practiced a hundred times then would recognize what was going on and act to stop it. They could just start smashing stuff if nothing else worked.

Only possibilities I see are 1) there is a nuke sub out there fully crewed by clowns, 2) someone got hold of the plans for a Ohio class sub and built one of their own (or disguised a sub from another nation to look like an American one), 3) there was no launch and the hacking was of the weather cam to plant false evidence that a launch took place.

 

Second link is in dire need or sauce. But anon is saying that the US military code for nuke-sub fuckery was transmitted.

Anonymous ID: 675dd1 July 15, 2018, 1:43 a.m. No.2161513   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1525 >>1854 >>2145 >>2149

>>2161442

 

The "think hack" photo appears to originate from a Defense News article from Jun 8 about Chinese hackers.

 

https://www.defensenews.com/cyber/2018/06/08/chinese-hackers-steal-sensitive-navy-program-data/

 

You can't just hack a whole sub and then FWOOSH! a missile flies away. The have to make for a specific depth, come to a complete stop, trim ballast tanks, pressurize launch tubes, open hatches, etc. And that's after rewiring the whole fire control system so the warhead can be armed with out the codes from the president's Nuclear Football. A missile can't launch without the people making it happen or letting it happen. Tomahawks are not surface to air missiles and don't have the range.

Anonymous ID: 675dd1 July 15, 2018, 1:56 a.m. No.2161563   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1570 >>1580

>>2161545

We couldn't go back to the gold standard even if we wanted to. There isn't enough of the stuff above ground to back all the USD in circulation. Well, we could; but it would mean greatly greatly increasing the price of gold or taking a hellavalot of USD out of circulation and the US Dollar no longer being the world's reserve currency.

Anonymous ID: 675dd1 July 15, 2018, 3:13 a.m. No.2161874   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1898 >>1899

>>2161859

>>2161179 (LB)

 

I'm still waiting for that anon to chime in with a link to where he found the ELEMENT COPPER thing. I haven't been able to find any public comm channel that would have such information in real time.

Anonymous ID: 675dd1 July 15, 2018, 3:32 a.m. No.2161952   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1965

>>2161941

The graphic is fake, but maybe not gay. It was pretty good distraction trolling.

I cannot rule out the word of mouth stuff about ELEMENT COPPER. I'd mark it as "probably not, but waiting for sauce".