>>2161366 (LB)
First link is about that missile launch photo that Q posted with "Think hack". Anon says that it's unlikely that USN sailors willfully launched a nuke missile and thinks the sub was hacked by (((them))).
Personally I'm skeptical of this interpretation. They are not setup in any way that could be hacked remotely. And there are a lot of steps involved in launching a missile from under water. If they lost helm control and saw their sub start going through the launch procedure that they have practiced a hundred times then would recognize what was going on and act to stop it. They could just start smashing stuff if nothing else worked.
Only possibilities I see are 1) there is a nuke sub out there fully crewed by clowns, 2) someone got hold of the plans for a Ohio class sub and built one of their own (or disguised a sub from another nation to look like an American one), 3) there was no launch and the hacking was of the weather cam to plant false evidence that a launch took place.
Second link is in dire need or sauce. But anon is saying that the US military code for nuke-sub fuckery was transmitted.