>>2159444

Naming your network about Q.

I was thinking about this as well. This is a fantastic idea, But, i'm not ready to put a target on my house, so I'm going to name my network something patriotic, rather then specifically Q. Anything patriotic is a really great idea. Thank you for putting out here.

My position on 'Who is Q?'.

The golden rule has always been, don't dox Q. I still agree with this, completely. If Q were to be revealed and on Trump team, then it would be viewed, by many, as merely Republican propaganda. The purpose of unity, regardless of party, and the search for the truth would be put in question completely. The whole idea of Q. We already know the answer: We are all Q. I don't think we should be looking for a different answer today. I think we should be pushing the answer is: "We are all Q". I also don't think this is what Q meant, about asking the question. Still not sure what the question should be. Maybe declassify? But we need to know and not forgot, that the president doesn't have the highest level of clearance. We all knew that, right? Someone(s) else, in the background does. Those are the people we don't necessarily hear about. Just my 2 cents.