i know this is probably just "going thru the motions" kind of stuff, but I hope they realize what happened is exactly what they wanted to happen.
Their only disappointment is they had to try it a second time.
Nassau County PD says the reports of an explosive device at Trump's Long Island rally was a FALSE ALARM. Here's there statement:
https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1836426542131613759
Unearthed footage of Kamala reveals the extent of her anti-gun radicalism:
“Just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible.”
If she is elected, RIP 2A.
https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1836429342806806920
UPDATE: Apparently the explosives found at the Trump rally were being used to help
train a bomb sniffing dog and are not a threat
Nassau County Police Commissioner says:
“Reports of explosives being found at the site are unfounded. There is a person who is being questioned who may have been training a bomb detection dog near the site," said Commissioner of Police Patrick Ryder.
Why are they questioning someone who brought explosives to help train a bomb dog?
Wouldn’t they know who is doing bomb detection?
This is strange
https://x.com/DC_Draino/status/1836425898645414320
if Trump supporters would boycott those platforms, they would come crawling back.
Imagine Meta losing 100,000,000 subs overnight.
If you look into historically suspicious events, you'll see a pattern in which there is some kind of training exercise or drill whose subject matter almost exactly overlaps with the real life thing that allegedly happens
This allows for plausible deniability when feds are caught—it was just confusion from the exercise
I'm not saying that this is what's happened here, but its interesting to point out this pattern.
https://x.com/DarrenJBeattie/status/1836426039771214317