Anonymous ID: 3518f3 Sept. 19, 2024, 5:04 p.m. No.21624867   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21624805

Scientism trying to pretend as if orbital mechanics hasn't been a thing for hundreds/thousands of years prior, here's something new, don't think anything of how absurdly unique such a statement is… don't think, basically.

Anonymous ID: 3518f3 Sept. 19, 2024, 5:13 p.m. No.21624923   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21624863

is there anyone else in a Jurisdiction that would be in a better position to know of a rotten judge, than the Sheriff?

 

Is there anyone else in a Jurisdiction that would be in a better position to know about a rotten Sheriff, than the Judge?

 

there are potentially some 3000 of these relationships across America.

Anonymous ID: 3518f3 Sept. 19, 2024, 5:37 p.m. No.21625052   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21624864

with respect to the Turing test

is there an equivalent to determine the difference between a human that is lying vs. a computer that is lying?

 

neither is helpful to humanity

but the computer would be well suited to laundering the human that programmed an A.I. to lie. basically BOTH are inhuman and rot everything they touch… but a computer would be vastly more destructive in a much shorter time

Anonymous ID: 3518f3 Sept. 19, 2024, 6:06 p.m. No.21625265   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5393

>>21625094

thank you for that

anon is neck deep in search for honest answers

would dive in if not for real world responsibilities

 

may have encountered what you wrote of

but was far too young to understand what was going on and reconcile… maybe kinda 'ptsd' for fifty years.

 

the second part you wrote will take some more time to absorb

Anonymous ID: 3518f3 Sept. 19, 2024, 6:26 p.m. No.21625393   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21625094

>>21625265

 

a computer that is mistaken, like a person, would not know that they have incorrect information, and both would relay that information without knowledge of their error. A genuinely innocent 'untruth'. Not a Lie, in the meaning of intent to deceive.

 

But a person that is intentionally deceptive and wants to remain undetected has to rely on their brain goo to hold the lies together (seems exhausting to me, which is why i am stunned by people that can do it boldface or for extended periods). The computer programed to lie, will not get exhausted but it might take drastic action quicker than a person if being pinched? Is that like the psychopath lashout? Or do both just try to walk away (or run and hide) when found out and caught 'red handed'?

 

Id still like to know how to catch one 'red handed'… despite the danger. I guess this whole thing is why i understand the 'catch a dangerous animal' thingy. Be it a human, a Demon or Computer that is telling lies, any one of those could go batshitcraycray if/when trapped in a corner.