Anonymous ID: 62798a Sept. 19, 2024, 7:51 p.m. No.21625923   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5926

>>21625898

>Happy?

Has nothing to do with what I'm feeling and you saying "perhaps you should have" is a bit of an understatement, the perhaps part. Not the best of backtracking, but I'll allow it.

Anonymous ID: 62798a Sept. 19, 2024, 7:57 p.m. No.21625945   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5950

>>21625926

>just about as bad as what you originally spoke up about

And there it is. I originally spoke up about you trying to speak for everyone, for "OG Anons," in an attempt to grandstand for consensus generation purposes against a certain anon to isolate and polarize, but you got called out on it so you tried to cover your ass by saying "perhaps I should have spoke for myself." You're an idiot, and I don't have time to waste on idiots of your nature tonight. I think I'll toss your sad, sorry ass into the filter where you can try to gatekeep personality not under your thumb to your heart's content.

Anonymous ID: 62798a Sept. 19, 2024, 8:45 p.m. No.21626193   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Ironic the little turd is running around calling people bootlickers when he's the little toadie following a script. KEK!