Anonymous ID: 2723c5 Sept. 20, 2024, 10:16 a.m. No.21629195   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21628467

I wouldn't call that a win. Trump should jettison the USSS and hire his own hand picked militia.

 

Post Watergate that's exactly what Nixon did. Why? Because he knew so much about they/them and they/them knew he knew..

 

Richard Nixon relinquished his Secret Service protection in 1985, the only president to do so.

 

Former President Richard M. Nixon has decided to do without the Secret Service detail that has accompanied him since he left the White House in 1974, and he plans to choose protection that will not by paid by the taxpayer.

 

Mr. Nixon has commissioned a complete study of his security needs, his assistant, John Taylor, said today. Once that's done, he will decide how to proceed.

 

Mr. Nixon is the first former President to refuse Federal protection.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/1985/03/13/us/nixon-dropping-protection-by-secret-service.html

Anonymous ID: 2723c5 Sept. 20, 2024, 10:39 a.m. No.21629347   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21628535

The ADL is guilty of using the subversive "chilling effect".

 

The term "chilling effect" is a First Amendment doctrine that refers to a law or government action that can limit or deter the use of First Amendment rights. It can occur when a law is too broad or vague, and people fear retaliation, prosecution, or other governmental action for engaging in expression.

 

The Supreme Court first used the term in the 1952 case Wieman v. Updegraff, which involved a loyalty oath for teachers. The term was used again in the case Lamont v. Postmaster General, where a law requiring postal patrons to authorize the delivery of "communist political propaganda" was overturned.

 

The chilling effect is often used to challenge rules that may over-deter protected speech. It can also be used to explain the role of speaker intent in protecting free speech.