this one pretends to be a Bible Scholar but just says nonsense.
go away
>>21628889
see how the sick minds of the shills try to pit people against each other?
they made personifications of time-of-day nouns and have them pretending to do different functions, as if rivals.
this is how you know that they are shills: they just make up nonsense and try to divide people with it.
that is why all time-of-day and shift references are so useful to mark out the shills.
anyone who presents such tripe is obviously creating a false narrative.
it's like saying "one O'clock hates two O'clock"
it's just foolish and manipulative.
this one pretends that an unkown group is able to 'map out' some alledged other group, as if that unknown group ( a bunch of clowns) doesn't need to follow law. They just start blowing stuff up and then declare 'we blew up the devices of evil people'
but here is the point: the unknown group as well follows evil methods, so why didn't their devices, too, start exploding? they may very well, because what comes around goes around.
without courts, without legality, without following the rules of combat, this one pretends that the unholy unknown group is a trusted source, when it is not, by evidenced by it's methods.
stop beleiving that the evil people you worship are authorities and authorized to say who is and is not a terrorist.
what they did was war crimes, and you, cheer leading them, become their apologist.
for me I'm horrified by boths sides in that conflict.
and these trolls here pretending that the unholy Mossad clown operations 'deem' fairly, when we all know that they do not.
you echo the wicked cheerleading.
be in awe of other things, anon. not that.
you are in dire straights following those who do evil methods in war time.
and, no, war crimes aren't 'patience and genius'
the deemer: taking common words used by everyone and demanding that they are monikers for the unholy
what a fragile mind you have, and such a foolish narrative.
filtered for going on with it.
good bye person who describes himself pretending it's the one who calls him out for the behavior that is clearly displayed.
by their fruits you know them.
when you tell them how they appear when they cheerlead depravity and war-criminality, and then all they can do is insult and project, you kind of don't need to go on with more.
tell them you filter and move along.
they get so so very angry when being reminded: neither side in that war have virtuous leadership, neither side is led by holy people, both sides do horrible and criminal things.
it's the common folks of either side who suffer, the leaderships of both those groups? they probably summer on the same beaches.
"why do you accuse me so"
oh, boo hoo hoo, someone here is 'accusing' you.
seems rather curious that someone who is so sure of themself would worry about being accused by someone who they clearly find incorrect.
you're not authentic, anon.
why ask a question that makes you look like a cry baby that you know the person isn't going to give you an honest answer.
assuming the other one is tweaking you: accusing you is kind of how you know what they are about, how you measure them.
President Trump is a threat
to their stake-holder oligarchy, which they call "our democracy"
haters gonna hate, anon, and slander (falsely accuse).
by their fruits, anon, you know them.
the 'reason' for what they do is discord and to try and get anon to ab-react.
burning man is so last decade.
it was the West Coasts feeble attempt to do what the East Coast had already been doing for years and years.
but instead of it being unlifting and affirmational, it is addicted and craven, and unholy.
and to be clear: the ones running it bringing people to a wasteland is symbolic of the wasteland of souls that we find in the kind of people who would want to participate in a three day drug fueled orgy.