“Do you not know that we are to judge the angels?”
I think it’s relevant. Q talks about reading the Bible. Bible quotes are not left field on this board. Also the cabal are satanists, so Christianity is a natural topic.
Brits, aside from those who know about the cabal, is there any dissenting opinions about the royal faintly in the UK? Or is it near total support, minus those who know the esoteric truth about them?
I know there’s split opinions on Jordan Peterson on this board, but assuming we don’t take him as an authority on global evil but just overcoming personal evil within ourselves, he has a lot of interesting and practical things to say.
He broke down the twelve step program with Russel Brand on Brand’s podcast. I strongly recommend for those looking to delve a little deeper into the philosophical and psychological implications of each step.
I worry sometimes that with all these pictures, we must be sharing some of slaves/trafficking victims.
I understand the criticisms 100% but my analysis of him is that he is still overcoming programming and that he is extremely careful in who he points to when it comes to making enemies.
His answers about IQ differentials among races and overrepresentation of Jews in key fields shows me that he understands these things but is unwilling to go on record with anything that can be used against him as “hateful.”
I think if we ignore him in topics outside of dealing with personal development and evaluation of symbolism/narrative, he can be insightful and pragmatic in ways that are useful and helpful to everyone.
A broken clock is right twice a day, and all that. When he’s talking about topics unrelated to the big picture, he seems to me to be right on the money about how the human brain and condition works.
It just has to be coupled with a larger understanding of the world than he offers.
He literally said “read your Bible.” That shows that there are at least some connections we can draw between Biblical narratives and our present day situation. I was absent the last two breads so I don’t know if it got distracting. But as one of many topics here, it’s relevant.
Thanks. Just want to be clear that I’m not disagreeing with you. I know exactly why you hold this opinion. I just lean towards seeing Peterson has misguided in areas and refusing to speak in others. But I guess even controlled opposition can have good points on the areas they are limited hangouts. If you discern the truth based on truth alone, and don’t take any figure as an ultimate authority to blindly follow, then I think the truth has merit anywhere it appears and no matter how much bullshit comes out of the same person.
For example, Cory Booker is cancerous but he has some messages to black America that are right on the money and worth taking a look at.
Hopefully no division here. Much respect, and not trying to argue.
Had a thought this morning. It’s a good thing POTUS is despised by so many. If he was universally beloved, Christians would probably assume he was the anti-Christ.
Okay, no further comment on this subject. Not intending to slide.
You aren’t wrong. We are called not to be hypocrites and not to judge by anything other than the standard by which we are judged. But we also are called to discern bad fruit and to carry out justice according to moral law here on Earth.
There’s actually a passage where God demands we put child sacrificers and moloch worshippers to death swiftly, and if we don’t, God will intervene to exercise justice. I think that might be what we are witnessing now with the Qvement.
Good to know. Thank you. I have such contempt for a family asserting some kind of ruling authority and demanding things like bowing and being treated like, well, royalty.
My opinion is that no human should bow to another. We are all equal in value. Religious folks should know to bow only to God, and atheists should theoretically not bow to anything whatsoever.
It’s just creepy and slave-like. Perhaps I’m bitter, but I’d love to see those in countries under the crown revolt against the idea of royal human beings.
As someone entrenched in Hollywood culture, we absolutely need light on the trafficking and sexual abuse that runs rampant here.
But I’ve also noticed the movement is used to apply pressure to non-abusive, standard male/female behavior, perhaps as a way to blackmail good men.
Not sure of a solution apart from the public understanding that sexual abuse has definitions apart from unwanted glances, attractions, showing interest, and innocent male/female touching.