Anonymous ID: c8f84e Sept. 23, 2024, 5:54 a.m. No.21643180   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3188 >>3426

>>21643176

3/4

There was an undercurrent of fascination that went beyond journalistic intrigue, bordering on obsession. Her constant desire for updates, coupled with the tone of her inquiries, made it clear she wasn’t merely reporting: She was weaving some kind of fantasy. I could sense her emotional investment growing. In that shift, the gossip centered less on politics and more on tracking and dissecting his every move. I noticed that whenever I criticized him, pointing out what I disliked or disagreed with, she was quick to defend him. I found it odd. Her judgment as a veteran political journalist seemingly dissolved as the months progressed.She appeared like a dazed schoolgirl discussing RFK, having lost the ability to view him objectively — a red flag I noted. She had become a full-fledged Kennedy fangirl.

 

My suspicions were further confirmed when I noticed some of the gossip I shared began leaking.

 

Up until meeting her, I had managed to keep a tight grip on sensitive information.Suddenly, tidbits I mentioned in confidence to just a couple of people began circulating in mainstream circles, sometimes even reaching political assassins like Lis Smith, a high-profile Democratic strategist opposing my efforts. It became clear that someone in my life was betraying my off-the-record remarks.

 

Recently, I urged Denise, who had also grown close to Olivia, to stop sharing campaign information with her. “I’m sure she’s leaking whatever we give her,” I warned.

 

The August afternoon in Palm Beach was the last straw. While discussing Olivia's latest interview with Trump in the sunroom, a family member pulled me aside after she left. “Can’t you see what she’s doing? She’s using you for information. She isn’t interested in you; she’s interested in what you know.”

 

In short, I felt foolish for letting the situation drag on so long. While I appreciated our different styles and audiences, it dawned on me that her appeal —how she gained people's trust and access — was rooted in seduction.

 

As for the leak, I am not privy to the details of how it occurred, but based on what I know, I strongly suspect it’s what Olivia wanted all along.In recent weeks, she began dropping hints about reckless texting with RFK, each cryptic revelation feeling intentional, as if she hoped I’d press her for more — or better yet, leak it myself.

 

What I can relay, based on both parties involved, is that they agree on the basic facts:It was not an affair; there was no physical relationship. They met in person just once for an interview. It was, at most, “a fleeting flirtation.”

 

According to sources,Olivia repeatedly lied about the textswhen confronted by her editors. Several see this as New York Magazine’s excuse to attack RFK, particularly as his recent alignment with Trump has led to a polling surge for him.

 

With Kennedy’s endorsement comes a wave of support from suburban mothers — a valuable demographic for Team Trump. Amplifying a trite sex scandal serves to deter his appeal within this voting bloc.

 

Friends of Kennedy believe Nuzzi set him up. They recount that just two weeks after New York Magazine published her article, she made a flirtatious remark during a phone conversation. In response, Kennedy blocked her number. A few weeks later, Nuzzi emailed him, asking to be unblocked, claiming she had urgent information about a hit piece being prepared against him. He unblocked her for that conversation, but later that night, she sent him a provocative picture, prompting him to block her again.

 

For most of the next 8 months, Kennedy kept her blocked, except for a few occasions when Nuzzi contacted him from different emails and phone numbers, insisting he unblock her for urgent discussions about an imminent hit piece. Once unblocked, she bombarded him with increasingly pornographic photos and videos that he found difficult to resist. After brief exchanges, he would block her again.

 

Security expert Gavin de Becker is currently investigating the situation for civil litigation that Kennedy intends to file, as well as for potential criminal referrals. “This had nothing to do with romance,” said de Becker. “He was being chased by porn.” de Becker added that Kennedy had repeatedly declined multiple invitations from Nuzzi for personal meetings.

 

Another anonymous source(an extensive subject during Olivia’s coverage of the Trump administration)spoke critically on a call today about Nuzzi's tactics, questioning the ethical boundaries she frequently crosses. “I’ve never met Bobby, and I don’t know him or any of his people,” the source stated, establishing a lack of vested interest. They expressed concern about Nuzzi's approach, highlighting an unsettling dynamic in their interactions.

 

https://jessicareedkraus.substack.com/p/the-talented-ms-

Anonymous ID: c8f84e Sept. 23, 2024, 5:56 a.m. No.21643188   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3226 >>3426

>>21643180

 

4/4

“Olivia contacted me during a period of significant political upheaval in the last decade. We spoke several times and met in person. Two things stand out: She’s undeniably talented — but she was flirtatious with me, and not in a professional way.”

 

Clarifying that the flirtation wasn’t overtly sexual, the source elaborated, “I’m not saying she was inviting me to sleep with her, but working with Olivia is very different from any other journalist, male or female.There’s a fine line between sexual seduction and informational seduction — and she crosses it. All the time.”

 

According to the source, Nuzzi employs subtle methods to create a personal connection — misconstrued words, friendly giggles, and telltale signs. The source emphasized that Nuzzi's tactics are not unique but have become a model for many young female journalists. “What Olivia Nuzzi has perfected has become a talent that others are emulating. Being flirtatious, being inappropriate — this is how she gains unique access. It’s problematic in the #MeToo era, where seduction can easily lead to damaging accusations.” The source mentioned Mark Robinson, Christopher Rufo, and RFK Jr. as examples of high-profile figures potentially targeted by these methods.

 

“Isn’t it odd that [RFK is] the first man accused of a digital affair? New York Magazine knows what kind of journalist she is; it didn’t matter until she crossed a line and sent inappropriate pictures to her subject. It didn’t matter until her subject was Robert Kennedy. No matter what it takes, they need to take him out.”

 

On the topic of RFK, the source continued, “I’m not a fan, but I’ve always read him. There’s no denying what a Kennedy endorsement of Trump does for certain voters. Suburban moms haven’t moved for Trump since the Access Hollywoodtapes. Now there’s subtle movement, and it’s all Bobby.” And why are suburban moms leaning towards Trump with RFK’s endorsement?

 

Because they are concerned about childhood chronic disease, which RFK takes very seriously.

And Democrats know that’s bad news for them.

 

“Even if they can’t prove it, they must accuse him. Because they only have 45 days. Suburban moms are for the first time considering Trump because of his partnership with Bobby. They have to stop him.Dems have to do two things:

 

Make it look like Trump isn’t serious about taking Bobby seriously [aka, like Trump won’t actually do anything to address childhood health issues], and make it look like Bobby isn’t a good person — character assassination to get the suburban mom vote. Accusing him of something that isn’t necessarily an affair but is offensive to Cheryl Hines is highly effective.”

 

Behind the scenes, many in health administrations reportedly agree with Bobby’s concerns surrounding vaccines, noting that, “What Pharma has tried and failed to do to Robert Kennedy — cancel him — New York Magazine is attempting to do, and they will fail too.”

 

Regarding Robert Kennedy’s New York Magazineinterview,the source speculated that Olivia employed her typical style: “New Journalism. Do whatever it takes to manipulate your subjectto get what you need from them, even if that means sexualizing the interaction.”

 

They suggested that Nuzzi’s boundary-blurring techniques have propelled her career, adding, “She doesn’t know the lines, and frankly, I think she doesn’t care. It’s worked out well so far.”

 

The source concluded with a stark critique: “Olivia Nuzzi will manipulate her subject in ways that would make Walter Cronkite spin in his grave. She would have gotten fired if she got caught doing this stuff even 10 years ago.

“Here’s my feeling: Olivia Nuzzi has never known the boundaries of ethical journalism. She routinely violates them. When New York Magazine discovered they had a weapon to destroy Robert Kennedy, suddenly they found their ethics.”

 

I went on to ask: What does a journalist like this do when they get older, with a career based on seduction? To which my source replied, “We don’t know, because it’s the first generation of journalists doing it.” But they think she’ll land on her feet. She’s very talented, after all.

 

“I think what Olivia didn’t understand is that she could push the boundaries until it was somebody remarkable. But with Robert Kennedy — he’s handsome, charming, famous, and from a legendary political family — she couldn’t pull back.”

As for Bobby? “All men are foolish. They all fall for it.”

 

https://jessicareedkraus.substack.com/p/the-talented-ms-nuzzi

 

Nuzzi imo is a malignant narcissist and will destroy anyone for fame.I knew this story was a major hit jobTrump should never be interviewed by her in the future. She's interviewed him a couple of times.

Anonymous ID: c8f84e Sept. 23, 2024, 6:01 a.m. No.21643226   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21643188

He's not handsome, he's charming and brilliant but its really about his family name

 

"But with Robert Kennedy — he’s handsome, charming, famous, and from a legendary political family — she couldn’t pull back.”