yet you have to be the first one to shit up this bread. Congrats asshole.
I know he loves us all. Now let's drop it and do some digging for our country.
God Bless America
God Bless DJT/Qteam/Anons
WWG1WGA
FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT
I don't remember seeing it. I think that's our Que to help push the DECLAS narrative.
Baker Notable?
Just stop, please.
At least the 3rd bread in a row you have posted this. You are glowing brightly. This obvious hate filled rant of yours only makes us stronger together to fight you. You have failed in your attempts. Bye shill.
Your hate is strong anon. I can feel it. I can't see any of your points with such hate filled rants.
WTF!?!?!
What makes you think Gowdy is confirming our guys? He just put a monkeywrench into the effort to oust RR! WTF is up with that?
If you had spoken to me in this format instead of being so hostile, then I would not have categorized it as hate. I asked you very nicely to please stop. Your reply was extremely hostile to me when you do not even know what side of the debate I am on.
You need to learn what the term division is. Show me where I have divided. I have asked repeatedly in a nice way for the sliding to stop. It is not healthy or productive to what we are trying to do here. There is a time and place for everything. When anons want to continue bringing something up that causes other anons to fight and argue, that is division. Those pushing to continue talking about a subject (religion) here KNOWING there will be arguments are the divisionshills.
What the religionshills don't seem to understand is that many anons here believe in God, but agree this is not the place for that discussion. There is a place to have that discussion. Say a prayer, if you feel the need. Quote a bible verse if you feel the need. But continuing to bring up such a hot topic serves no purpose other than to divide us.
> I’m just disheartened by your division attempts.
Here is your hostility again. You actually have no idea which side of the fence I sit with my beliefs. Yet you call me a divider. Why is that?
Instead of dropping this topic on a new bread, you bring it forth yet again. So who is the real divider here?
If you want allies, then listen to what others are telling you instead of calling them dividers. Accusations will not get you very far.
There is the rub, isn't it. Every logical argument that says he is black hat has an equal argument that says he is white hat. However, Q seems to allude to him being black hat. Q says he will lost either way. Sounds to me like not /our guy/. Reading Q's crumbs I believed that this forced impeachment is part of the plan. Read these and tell me you think RR is white hat.
[RR] must either comply with all document demands or face impeachment.
2-way failure.
If he complies, he fails (self-implication)(known conflict). ←—
If he failes to comply, he gets impeached (removed). ←—
Why no DOJ texts disclosed to the public?
RR to LL "……………" ←—
LL to H "……………"
X to X "………………….."
JC to LL 247x (relevant)
LL IS KEY to CONNECTING TO WH / HRC/BC/JB/JC/SP/EH…..
Once the documents are supplied and viewed by Senate and Congressional leaders (& the public), they LOSE. ←—
Maybe, maybe not. So then all Q's drops about impeaching RR was for nothing? Disinfo? All the noise about getting the whole house behind the measure to pressure doj to provide docs? All of that is just disinfo and we should not expect impeachment of RR? We should expect RR to be a white hat in direct contrast to what Q said? Is that really making sense to you? Thanks to Gowdy, impeachment is off the table. SO what would you like to see done to force DOJ to turn over those docs? You want Potus to declas so the rabid left can attack him? This was suppose to keep Potus from having those bad optics.
SMH at the excuses for Gowdy.
Here are the 8 articles of Impeachment that was drawn up in April. We don't know of all 8 of those conditions still exist or if RR finally complied with some.
ROSENSTEIN IMPEACHMENT
8 Articles have been drafted. Drafted in April. Unknown if RR complied with any of these.
-
Engaged in a pattern of conduct incompatible with the trust and confidence placed in him in that position by refusing to comply with a subpoena issued by the House Committee on the Judiciary on March 22, 2018 in connection to the congressional investigation seeking documents and information related to potential abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act;
-
Failed to enforce multiple laws; including improper authorization of searches and electronic surveillance under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and Executive Order 12333 on Intelligence;
-
Failed to act on the behalf of the Attorney General by properly supervising the administration of FISA by failing to demonstrate probable cause to believe that targets of surveillance were a foreign power or agents of a foreign power, that a significant purpose of the surveillance was to obtain foreign intelligence information, and that appropriate minimization procedures were in place;
-
Failed his oath of office by refusing to discipline or recommend the removal of DOJ personnel after obtaining evidence of disqualifying conflicts of interest demonstrated throughout the course of the ongoing investigation regarding charging decisions in the investigation surrounding former Secretary Clinton’s private email server in 2016;
-
Knowingly provided misleading statements related to his supervision of the initial Department of Justice investigation into the Trump campaign’s alleged contacts with Russia when he testified under oath before Congress on December 13, 2017 that any involvement FBI attorney Bruce Ohr had in the Russian investigation was without his knowledge;
-
Failed to recuse himself from supervising the Department of Justice’s response to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the House Committee on the Judiciary’s joint congressional investigation seeking documents related to potential abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act when his fairness or objectivity could reasonably be questioned after he had supervised the application process for the potentially improper FISA warrants at issue in the investigation;
-
Knowingly and intentionally prevented the production of documents and information to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the House Committee in an effort to delay and impede the congressional investigation into potential abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act; and
-
Knowingly and intentionally prevented the production of all documents and information dated between December 2016-May 2017 in an effort to delay and impede the production of information referring and relating to the FBI and broader Department of Justice’s initial investigation into the Trump campaign’s alleged contacts with Russia.
Indeed I am aware. I did the research last night and even posted it. No one cared. Didn't even make notables cause no one cares.
The ONLY way to get RR to turn over the docs is by threat of impeachment. Now Gowdy siding with RR. No reason for RR to comply with Congress. Doesn't sound like a good plan to me. But whatever. I'm just a stupid concernfag.