Anonymous ID: 9f35d3 July 15, 2018, 11:19 a.m. No.2164810   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4821 >>4825 >>4841 >>4940 >>4941 >>4998 >>5118

Gowdy says he won't support Rosenstein impeachment

 

The chairman of the powerful House Oversight and Government Reform Committee said Sunday he doesn't support a push by conservative lawmakers to impeach Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

 

“No. For what? Impeach him for what? No,” Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) said on CBS' "Face the Nation."

 

“I've had my differences with Rod Rosenstein. I talk to him quite often privately, which again is a lot more constructive than the public hearings we have,” Gowdy said. “He's a Trump appointee. So is [Attorney General] Jeff Sessions. So is [FBI Director] Chris Wray. If President Trump is dissatisfied with Rod Rosenstein, he can fire him with a tweet.”

 

The deputy attorney general, who oversees special counsel Robert Mueller’s sprawling Russia probe and is a frequent target of President Donald Trump’s ire, has been accused by House Republicans of dragging his feet in responding to requests for documents related to Mueller’s work.

POLITICO reported last week that House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), Freedom Caucus founder Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and other conservatives are launching a new effort to oust Rosenstein and are putting the finishing touches on an impeachment filing.

 

Gowdy said he's unsure there's enough support for that in the House.

 

“I'm not convinced there is a movement,” Gowdy said. “I read about it in POLITICO and sometimes their sources are better than mine. But I'm not part of that.”

Anonymous ID: 9f35d3 July 15, 2018, 11:29 a.m. No.2164902   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4921

Mueller Prepares To Target Key Individuals Once Special Counsel Probe Wraps Up

 

As special counsel Robert Mueller faces pressure to wrap up his investigation with or without the illusive collusion charge, the Washington Post reports that the Department of Justice and Mueller's team have been preparing to pass the baton of various ongoing investigations once the probe is complete.

 

Meanwhile, inside the Justice Department, law enforcement officials have discussed several scenarios in which the prosecutions of people who may be charged as a result of Mueller’s investigation are farmed out to other offices to handle any future trials.

 

In those scenarios, these people said, some prosecutors on Mueller’s team could move with their cases to Justice Department headquarters or individual U.S. attorney offices, these people said. -Washington Post

 

The Post also reveals that "the transferring of some cases has already begun," while Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said on Friday that Mueller's case against 12 indicted Russian military officers would be handled by DOJ prosecutors at the Justice Department headquarters (it also doesn't take that much to sit on a case that will never see a courtroom, and the open file may linger for years, but we digress).

 

There are also practical reasons to begin shuffling cases and attorneys over to the DOJ. For one, President Trump could fire Mueller if this continues to drag on - a prospect made more and more likely as time goes on without the emergence of any actual evidence of collusion. But the most logical answer is that the investigation may simply be nearing its natural end, as cases against several individuals targeted by the probe are approaching resolution. Sentencing dates have already been set for two people who cooperated with Mueller's probe and pleaded guilty to charges; George Papadopoulos and Richard Pinedo - a California man who was charged with operating a Russian internet trolling outfit. The Sentencing of former national security adviser Michael Flynn, however, has been pushed back several times, with the next court appearance being August 24.

 

Then there are all the loose strings with Paul Manafort, the Podesta Group (ah who are we kidding), Michael Cohen and others the public may or may not know about. Mueller's probe ballooned in size as "mission creep" set in and investigatory avenues led to yet more investigations - requiring more attorneys.

 

In the past six months, the number of prosecutors working on cases he has brought has expanded significantly, with new additions casting light on the special counsel’s potential priorities and focuses. Court filings show that at least half a dozen new names are participating in Mueller’s work, all current Justice Department prosecutors. Their backgrounds vary widely, from prosecuting violent crimes to cyber attacks.

 

Sol Wisenberg, who worked on Ken Starr’s independent counsel investigation of the Clinton White House, told The Daily Beast that the expansion of Mueller’s probe was to be expected. -Daily Beast

 

“I don’t think it’s unusual at all,” says Wisenberg. “That’s what happened with us. You get more cases or your cases become more complex, you need more prosecutors and you need more agents.”

 

“They wouldn’t bring them on if they didn’t need them,” he added. “They’re not bringing them on for grins. There’s work there that needs to be done or they would not be bringing them in.”

 

About that Trump interview

 

Member Trump's inner circle and legal team tell the Post that Mueller may decide against a lengthy subpoena battle for Trump to testify - while Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, leery of a "perjury trap," has insisted that the president not be required to answer certain questions.

 

Among them: that Mueller not ask any questions about actions Trump has taken as president, including his private discussions with then-FBI Director James B. Comey.

 

Giuliani said Trump does not recall asking Comey to drop an investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn and he does not want the president to be accused of lying about the episode. -Washington Post

 

The president firmly believes he didn’t say it,” Giuliani said.

 

“He doesn’t recall it. . . . But Mueller could come out the other way,” he added. “They’ll say he’s lying. We don’t want to expose him to perjury [accusations].”

 

Trump's attorneys haven't received a response from Mueller regarding their terms, however one person briefed on the discussions doesn't expect Mueller to agree to them. "But if he did, well, then we'd face a really interesting choice."

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-15/mueller-prepare-target-key-individuals-once-special-counsel-probe-wraps

Anonymous ID: 9f35d3 July 15, 2018, 11:31 a.m. No.2164921   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2164902

 

The Special Counsel Enigma

#1215294

Q

!xowAT4Z3VQ

27 Apr 2018 - 4:39:07 PM

Reconcile.

Reporting incorrect?

Per WH?

The day before.

Enemy?

Slave?

Mueller & U1?

Mueller &

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/08/robert-mueller-counsel-financial-records-241414

Comey to POTUS - not being investigated.

RR to POTUS - not being investigated.

Mueller to POTUS - not a criminal target.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/19/rosenstein-tells-trump-is-not-target-cohen-investigation.html

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/03/mueller-claims-trump-is-not-criminal-target-in-his-investigation-report-says.html

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/336802-rnc-comey-testimony-proves-trump-not-under-investigation

Baiting POTUS?

Why no contact w/ WL / JA?

What is being investigated?

Why is Mueller’s team stacked w/ ex Clinton / D sr level authorities?

Why are POTUS supporters screaming for END?

POTUS WITCH HUNT END

ADD RUDY (quiet).

Can the investigation officially/publicly drop POTUS from review & continue?

Why did the Podesta Group close shop?

https://www.pacer.gov

Why are known bad actors in full support of Mueller?

Why did POTUS interview (FBI Dir) Mueller a day prior to SC appointment if impossible to assign position?

Why did Sessions recuse?

What are the powers of Huber / IG (H)?

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/

Who has the POWER?

Who can know?

Are D’s using as midterm tactic to win House?

Are D’s using as ammo to gain majority to impeach?

Impeach on what grounds?

What facts exist to impeach?

House report POTUS no evidence of collusion.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/27/house-intelligence-committee-releases-russia-report.html

Mueller report will contradict per Brennan Tweet today?

Disconnect exists.

R’s / D’s negative for POTUS.

Insurance policy?

Comey release of memos to obtain SC?

SC attack POTUS WITCH HUNT

SC/Comey/RR state POTUS not under investigation.

Flynn pleads guilty to none committed crime?

S interviewed?

S/P relationship w/ judge?

#2/S/P 302 mod?

Fusion GPS.

The Brits - raw intel / dossier / 5 eyes.

GOOG

DNC rigging super delegates / funding/ voter rolls / agreement BS

Election/voter fraud

CIA

DNI

FBI

DOJ

Sec of State

President.

…………

More than you can imagine.

re: HRC insurance [win]

Why?

Cover?

Remainder illegal acts.

Confused?

SC targeting who?

SC on team?

SC off team?

Questions reveal answers.

Time will tell.

Q