>>2164842

Disinformation. We know Q has specifically point to Gowdy before, hinting that he's meant for something more.

Theory: What if his statements on [[[RR]]] are meant to make him seem objective? Let Jordan, Desantis, and the other FC Repubs be the rabble rousers needed to get under the collars of the DS. Gowdy stays away from the fray and appears like he's only interested in getting to the truth, not rabble rousing or taking political potshots.

Important because he could take on a role in the Justice Department, or be used to prosecute the traitors. Hell, he may even replace [[[RR]]] or Sessions. (Not dissing Sessions, but the dude's 70-something years old. He may not have much fight left in him.)

We're watching a movie. Gowdy has a role to play. I suspect his is to remain objective so if he does get picked by Trump for a position he can have an easier time getting the votes to be approved.

>>2165072

Ok, not related. But I couldn't have been the only one to see the color pants Melania was wearing and think "Is she wearing anything down there?!" when she first appeared in the shot, right?

>>2165164

Concernfag is obvious. Way to ignore everything I said in my post.

>>2165291

Yes, you are. When I said "Disinformation" I meant on the part of Gowdy, not Q. Try rereading my post again in that light.

>>2165381

I said a few boards back Q is right, but allowing Strzok to play the part of the villain to give the DS a face. Like putting Hitler's mug up when talking about Nazis or Tojo the Japanese in WW2. Personify the enemy to unite the people around a common image, instead of the nebulous Deep State.