Anonymous ID: cc5a89 Sept. 24, 2024, 4:48 p.m. No.21651686   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1814 >>1855 >>1860 >>1877

Canada #63 >>21649725

WOW! Barack Obama’s Former Canadian Ambassador Reveals Zoom Call With Hollywood Celebrities and Social Media Influencers To Discuss Undetectable Way To Steal The 2024 Election

by Patty McMurray Sep. 24, 2024

 

Democrats have devised a brilliant plan to steal our election in 2024—and it’s really quite simple.

 

By telegraphing to the American people that they believe the key to winning our elections is getting 9 million individuals to vote for Kamala Harris from a pool of 2.4 million eligible overseas voters in total (according to US government data), Democrats essentially remove the shock value when it’s announced they only achieved a percentage of their goal when it’s revealed they received millions of new overseas votes

 

For those determined to decide the outcome of our elections by using every possible loophole, like the United States FVAP website and the Democratic Party overseas registration website, VoteFromAbroad.org, where overseas voters can register to vote and request an absentee ballot at the same time, it would seem to an outsider a brilliant plan.

 

The problem is for those concerned about the legitimacy or security of our elections: the fact that none of the so-called “9 million voters” Democrats claim they are trying to recruit will have to prove their identity or even provide a legitimate address for their past or present residence in the United States, leaving America with another significantly flawed election outcome with no way to prove it once the votes are cast.

 

Last week, the Gateway Pundit published the first investigative piece in a series explaining how easily our elections can be stolen without a trace.

 

According to Heather Honey at Verity Vote, the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA) is a Federal law passed in 1986.

 

UOCAVA requires that the states allow members of the US Armed Forces, their family members, and US citizens who reside outside of the US to register and vote absentee in elections for Federal offices in a standardized format.

 

After HAVA passed in 2002, there were numerous projects undertaken to test the viability of electronic voting for UOCAVA eligible voters. The 2004 Secure Electronic Registration and Voting Experiment (SERVE) project was intended to develop an Internet-based registration and voting system in 55 volunteer counties.

 

However, the SERVE project was canceled before it was deployed due to security concerns, including findings that the use of personal computers over the Internet could not be made secure enough for public elections.

 

Security professionals also pointed out that it was critical that the States, not FVAP or contractors, would have ultimate control of the servers used in any such system.

 

After the cancellation of the SERVE Project, FVAP developed and tested the Interim Voting Assistance System (IVAS), which was fielded in 2006. This system provided for electronic submission of ballot requests and delivery of blank ballots using a Department of Defense secure server.

 

Use of this system was restricted to voters enrolled in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS), which was the source for voter identification valida- tion. DEERS covers members of the military and their dependents. Only those whose identity and eligibility could be verified were given access to download a blank ballot from the secure server.

 

In 2009, Pew Trusts released a report in which they claimed that Military Voters were being denied their right to vote in 2008 due to voting impediments.

 

This report, which was funded by the JEHT Foundation, was used as justification by Chuck Schumer to advocate for electronic delivery of ballots to unverified non-military requestors claiming to be US citizens living overseas.

 

Advocacy for military voting access had wide support, and lobbying efforts described the bill as benefiting the military, but in reality, non-military overseas voters benefited most from the changes–a bait-and-switch.

 

The result of Pew’s reporting and Schumer’s advocacy was a revision to UOCAVA.

 

The MOVE Act further requires states to deliver the ballots by email and other electronic means to all who request them. It also enabled counties to use online communication, email correspondence, and websites for voting.

 

More:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/09/wow-barack-obamas-former-canadian-ambassador-reveals-zoom/