>>21653456

>Big threats on my life by Iran

Doubt it.

Neo-cons have been trying to go to war with Iran for a long time.

Same neo-cons who want war with Russia, China and any other nation that is not under their thumb of control, who have a populist leader.

Most (D)emoncrats today are neo-cons.

Just like (R)inos.

Most Demoncrats and Rinos hate Trump.

They hate anyone who is a populist leader.

They hate anyone who is not under their full directed control.

I won't fall for this ruse.

And I will never fight in their unjust wars overseas.

Blaming Iran is typical of them, just as typical as blaming Russia for their horrible failed foreign policies.

>>21653798

Well, nonetheless, like you said it's just a scapegoat. The blame game, always blaming our problems here at home on someone else when, in fact, it is simply the bad leadership and extremely corrupted politics we have today. I'm not falling for any of it anymore, the bullshit needs to end or this country will come to an end eventually. Either way.

>>21653814

I'm not shilling, I'm just saying I don't fall for blaming Iran for the assassination attempts is all. It's a bunch of pro-big govt neo-con/leftist brainwashed wackjobs who would like to kill a former president over the fact he's a populist leader who actually gives a shit about the future of this country.

>>21653817

Well bombing Gaza into rubble is not going to give Hamas an incentive to release those poor folks anymore I'm afraid.

>>21653804

Give poor 'ol Blinken a break for once, he's been very busy losing another major failed war!

>>21653861

WTF is that for real!?

>>21653870

No problem bro

>>21653883

Yah most countries have central banks, thus the prime reason so many governments are corrupted around the world. Iran is no different than any other country really.

>>21653888

Yah, although it's sad so many have to suffer from all these senseless wars and the never-ending corruption and graft. Hopefully that will change sometime soon, who knows?

>>21653895

Should have known, dumb me. I actually thought the Clinton Foundation was sponsoring those death pods LOL.

>>21653909

Yah, correct me if I'm wrong but aren't all central banks Rothschild owned though?

>>21653918

Hmmmmm, maybe that's the reason behind all these senseless wars, over control of the central banks. If you control the central bank, you can in turn control governmental policy to a large extent.

Deep State gonna be pissed at this….

Czech President Petr Pavel, a former NATO general, has told the New York Times in an interview that Ukraine needs to be “realistic” about its goals in the war and that the most likely outcome of the conflict is that Ukraine will have to concede some territories.

The admission that Ukraine may have to cede territory is especially surprising from Pavel, who the New York Times describes as one of the most steadfast supporters of Ukraine.

“The most probable outcome of the war will be that a part of Ukrainian territory will be under Russian occupation, temporarily,” he said.

However, the “temporary” occupation could last years, according to Pavel, who is currently visiting the US.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ukraine-needs-be-realistic-and-give-territory-russia-says-czech-president

>>21653902

Remember when most ammunition was less than 50 cents per round?

>>21653934

Yah, that same party decided it was a good idea to shut down German nuclear power plants after sanctioning Russian oil….. complete dumb asses. Glad to hear they got BTFO in the recent elections over there.

>>21653939

It's getting so damn expensive I can't practice as much anymore like I used to :/

>>21653946

Maybe part of the 'green' psyop is the wealthy are actually investing in coal while virtue signalling the need for alternative energies? Would not be surprised if that were the case.

Ukraine Needs To Be "Realistic" And Give Up Territory To Russia, Says Czech President

Czech President Petr Pavel, a former NATO general, has told the New York Times in an interview that Ukraine needs to be “realistic” about its goals in the war and that the most likely outcome of the conflict is that Ukraine will have to concede some territories.

The admission that Ukraine may have to cede territory is especially surprising from Pavel, who the New York Times describes as one of the most steadfast supporters of Ukraine.

“The most probable outcome of the war will be that a part of Ukrainian territory will be under Russian occupation, temporarily,” he said.

However, the “temporary” occupation could last years, according to Pavel, who is currently visiting the US.

He cited war fatigue after 19 months of war and that conflict was “growing everywhere.” Under such a scenario, Ukraine “will have to be realistic” about how likely it is to recover territory from Russia.

According to Pavel, neither Ukraine nor Russia can expect to achieve their maximalist goals. “To talk about a defeat of Ukraine or defeat of Russia, it will simply not happen,” he said, adding that the end result will be “will be somewhere in between.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ukraine-needs-be-realistic-and-give-territory-russia-says-czech-president

>>21653969

Are we ever going to find out what all those "sealed indictments" are all about?

UK's National Grid Admits It Doesn't Have A Clue How To Reach Net Zero

A few weeks ago, Energy Secretary Ed Miliband and his Head of Mission Control, Chris Stark wrote a public letter to Fintan Slye of the National Grid ESO asking for practical advice on how to deliver a clean power grid by 2030.

The letter asked Slye to set out a range of pathways to enable a decarbonised power system by 2030. For each pathway they asked for the forecast energy generation and demand mix and the underlying assumptions that need to be met for these to be deliverable. They also asked for the key requirements for the transmission network and interconnectors and for a high-level assessment of the costs, benefits, opportunities, challenges and risks as well as the key actions to be taken by Government, NESO, Ofgem and industry to enable delivery of the pathways.

Recently, Fintan Slye took to X to announce his initial response. Strangely Slye’s letter is not addressed to Miliband or Stark, but takes the form of an open letter to industry.

Last week @energygovuk asked the ESO to develop advice on how to achieve a decarbonised power system by 2030. Read my open letter to learn how we’ll develop our plan, how it will interact with other energy reforms and how we’ll engage with industry

— Fintan Slye (@FintanSlye_eso)

September 3, 2024

The letter starts off with warm words announcing the formation of a “cross-cutting delivery unit” that will report back to Government by the end of Autumn 2024, less than three months away. It says its plan will be:

A whole systems spatial view of what is required to deliver a clean, secure, operable electricity system by 2030. The plan will consider possible clean energy generation mixes and their associated network, market and operability requirements, referred to as pathways.

That sounds good as far as it goes.

However, the letter then goes on to say that all pathways will “meet clean power in 2030 against a definition to be agreed with U.K. Government.”

In other words, there is no agreed definition of what a zero-carbon grid by 2030 actually means. It does not know what the target is. It seems that Miliband and Labour have set the country on a journey without properly defining the destination. And the initial request from Miliband and Stark reveals they don’t know how to get there. It’s the blind leading the blind to an unknown destination.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/uks-national-grid-admits-it-doesnt-have-clue-how-reach-net-zero