Anonymous ID: ec09ea Sept. 25, 2024, 8:52 a.m. No.21654980   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21654958

when you quote stuff ought you not provide sauce as t owhere it is from.

are you the type that when you read about the acts of bad people written by good people you pretend that it's the good people who are promoting that behavior?

seems to be a bit of a non sequitur posting this to me, anon. explain yourself.

PS: I didn't post to you so why did you post to me?

Anonymous ID: ec09ea Sept. 25, 2024, 8:57 a.m. No.21655008   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21654981

>>21654981

>>21654981

oh, I see, you're just posting quotes without any real purpose.

you know when you quote scripture if you do it caprciously and without context it might be seen to be mocking.

and pepole will ask you to explain yourself.

and they will want a good explanation.

if you have their attention why would you disrespect them by going on with the behavior of unseemly people in the very ancient past?

what you are doing might be called 'mocking'

quoting from a post about fuel oil seems a bit capricious.

Anonymous ID: ec09ea Sept. 25, 2024, 9:05 a.m. No.21655041   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5072

>>21655011

so your purpose seems clear but why do you post this?

you dont' explain your purpose in posting this?

next are you going to do one about how ancient amphora may have been an ancient form of batteries?

so they discovered hydro carbon based flameable oil?

so what?

why is this relevant?

Anonymous ID: ec09ea Sept. 25, 2024, 9:28 a.m. No.21655133   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5173

>>21655115

what you are doing is sliding my efforts.

you are pretending that I am a problem.

doesn't that seem to be one of the definitions of 'shill'?

you denigrate my efforts and make yourself seem self-righteous.

if I'm doing what you're saying why are you 'feeding' me?

seems a bit hypocritical in some sense.

you don't respect me enough and act like I'm a shill.

and if I were a shill why aren't you just filtering and moving on?

Anonymous ID: ec09ea Sept. 25, 2024, 9:30 a.m. No.21655148   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5175 >>5178

>>21655138

verification.

a team trying to drive away the anon who throw eggs into the fans of shills.

you don't like me debunking so the two of you go after me.

the illogic of the first is exposed by my post, so you start in with the name calling.

Anonymous ID: ec09ea Sept. 25, 2024, 9:43 a.m. No.21655224   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21655175

all you can do is name call.

I see.

you're an apologist for the slavers of the middle ages who tried to take out all of Christiandom, relying on their 'resist not evil' philosophy until they realized that the Muslims weren't ever going to stop and that they needed to give a payback for what the Muslims had done.

 

There was no Muslim golden age, anon.

it was a 'slaver age'