>>21654344 pb
NOTABLE
[#483] :hide
▶ Anonymous 09/25/24 (Wed) 09:19:32 35450f (3) No.21654344>>21654556
File (hide): 6f3341efc6c9d9a⋯.png (152.09 KB,992x828,248:207,ClipboardImage.png) (h) (u)
File (hide): bd9dd7cced7391f⋯.png (111.57 KB,1015x632,1015:632,ClipboardImage.png) (h) (u)
Aug 29th DoD ordered Northcom to aid USSS protecting Presidential and VP candidates.
DC Mayor requested from Homeland that J6 be designated National Special Security Event and Mayorkas granted the request. It puts USSS ( with military aid) in charge of security
Previously, Inauguration was designated National Special Security Event and planning began several months ago.
Why are they going to great efforts to protect the candidates, protect the ceremonial certification, protect the swearing in, BUT not protect the election that makes all these other events happen?
Why would they choose J6 and exclude J3 ?== If there is danger surrounding J6, then swearing in the people ( J3) who are going to have the ceremonial certification is of equal danger?
This smells bad. I don't feel confident the good guys are in control of Northcom right now. These facts and questions don't support a theory in which Northcom are the good guys.
As long as States certify by Dec 17th and transmit the certification by dec 25th deadline, J6 doesn't even need to happen in order to swear in Trump.
https://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/2024-election-key-dates-beyond-election-day/