Discussion on Trevor Moore LB
Started watching Joe R. #626
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZGKqw9lu158
then decided to see Trevor comedy and found this
https://youtube.com/watch?v=XJh6jgnqn_s <<<embed
Trevor doing a Biber skit 10yrs ago
He was spot on.
Purple Revolution tie.
Can fill a bingo hall.
Faces on balls instead of numbers.
Can be eletronic game.
Computer generated cards and balls with all their faces/names.
Just need a name.
Big Club Bingo
edits (edits)
Hillary Clinton's Purple Revolution
The “Purple Revolution” refers to a hypothetical movement or initiative aimed at uniting Democratic “Blue America” and (RINO) Republican “Red America” under a single banner, as proposed by Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign. The term “Purple” symbolizes the coming together of these two traditionally opposing political ideologies.
Origins and Symbolism
During Hillary Clinton’s concession speech on November 9, 2016, she and her husband, Bill Clinton, wore purple attire, sparking speculation about the significance of this color choice. Purple is often associated with spirituality, royalty, and penitence, reflecting the Methodist tradition to which Hillary Clinton belongs. Some interpreted the purple attire as a symbol of (partisan) bipartisanship and unity between (RINO) Republicans and Democrats.
George Soros Connection
The “Purple Revolution” concept was also linked to George Soros, a billionaire philanthropist and Democratic Party supporter. According to some sources, Soros was planning a “Purple Revolution” in America, which would resist the Trump administration’s efforts to reverse globalist policies implemented by the Obama and Clinton administrations. The Clintons, who had received significant funding from Soros, were allegedly involved in launching this initiative.
Conspiracy Theories
Some conspiracy theorists, such as Erik Prince, former founder of Blackwater, have suggested that Soros is behind a “Purple Revolution” aimed at toppling the Trump presidency. This theory was fueled by Hillary Clinton’s purple attire during her concession speech and the perceived connections between Soros and the Clinton Foundation.
In Conclusion
The “Purple Revolution” remains a hypothetical concept, with unclear goals and motivations. While Hillary Clinton’s purple attire during her concession speech sparked speculation about its significance, the actual meaning and implications of this symbol remain unclear. The George Soros connection adds a layer of complexity, with some interpreting it as a potential resistance movement against the Trump administration’s policies. However, without further evidence or clarification, the true nature and scope of the “Purple Revolution” remain unclear.
chkt
new the mob connect
dinna know the lineage
Jewish mob exists parallel to Mafia
Jewish Mob = Gay Mafia west coast?
Devil's Breath Tree
The Devil’s Breath Tree refers to two different plants: the Borrachero tree (Brunfelsia spp.) and the Brugmansia tree. Both plants are known for producing scopolamine, a powerful alkaloid with hallucinogenic and amnesic properties.
Borrachero Tree (Brunfelsia spp.)
Native to the Andean region of South America, particularly in Colombia and Ecuador
Seeds contain scopolamine, which is used as a date rape drug and for criminal purposes
The tree’s flowers are said to have a sweet, pleasant aroma
=#Brugmansia Tree==
Native to South America, particularly in Colombia and Peru
Seeds also contain scopolamine, which is used for similar criminal purposes
The tree’s flowers are showy and fragrant, with white and yellow colors
Common Properties
Both trees produce scopolamine, a potent alkaloid with hallucinogenic and amnesic effects
The drug is often used to incapacitate victims, leading to amnesia and a loss of free will
Criminals can dissolve the powder in drinks or food, making it difficult to detect
Note: The Devil’s Breath Tree is not a single, specific species, but rather a colloquial term referring to the Borrachero and Brugmansia trees, which both contain scopolamine.
yup
big discuss /pol/ when clintons walked out for concession speech
Victoria Nuland orchestrated the Orange Revolution including the shootings on 100.
————
Color Revolution Phenomenon
The Color Revolution refers to a series of peaceful street protests and uprisings that took place in several post-Soviet states from 2003 to 2005. These movements aimed to overthrow corrupt and undemocratic regimes, ushering in new governments and promising democratic change.
Key Events
Rose Revolution (Georgia, 2003): Protesters demanded free and fair elections, leading to the resignation of President Eduard Shevardnadze and the election of Mikhail Saakashvili.
Orange Revolution (Ukraine, 2004): Demonstrations against electoral fraud resulted in a re-run of the presidential election, ultimately leading to the victory of Viktor Yushchenko.
Tulip Revolution (Kyrgyzstan, 2005): Protests against electoral fraud and government corruption led to the resignation of President Askar Akayev and the election of Kurmanbek Bakiyev.
Common Themes
Peaceful Protests: Color Revolutions were characterized by non-violent street protests, distinguishing them from traditional revolutions.
External Influence: The United States and other Western powers played a significant role in supporting and facilitating these movements.
Democracy Promotion: The Color Revolutions were seen as opportunities for democratic breakthroughs in the post-Soviet region.
Challenges and Criticisms
Lack of Consolidated Democracy: Many of the new governments failed to establish stable, democratic institutions, leading to concerns about the sustainability of these revolutions.
Authoritarianism: Some Color Revolution leaders, such as Kurmanbek Bakiyev in Kyrgyzstan, eventually consolidated power and undermined democratic reforms.
External Interference: Critics argued that external powers’ involvement in the Color Revolutions undermined local agency and created new forms of dependency.
Legacy
The Color Revolutions had a significant impact on international relations and democracy promotion efforts. While they did not always achieve lasting democratic change, they highlighted the importance of peaceful protest and the potential for grassroots movements to shape political outcomes.
Ukraine's Maidan Revolution(aka Orange)
The Maidan Revolution, also known as the Revolution of Dignity, was a complex and multifaceted social movement that transformed Ukraine’s political landscape in 2013-2014. The revolution began on November 21, 2013, when Ukraine’s President Viktor Yanukovych suspended talks on an association agreement with the European Union, opting instead for closer ties with Moscow.
Key Events
Initial Protests: Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians gathered in Kyiv’s Independence Square (Maidan) to protest Yanukovych’s decision, demanding greater European integration and democratic reforms.
Police Crackdown: As the protests continued, the government responded with force, beating and detaining peaceful protesters. This escalated tensions and galvanized the Maidan movement.
Grassroots Organization: Activists established a network of social organizations, providing logistical support, medical aid, and legal assistance to protesters. This decentralized structure allowed the movement to adapt and evolve.
Maidan Square Clashes: In February 2014, deadly clashes between protesters and security forces occurred on Maidan Square, resulting in the deaths of dozens of people.
Ousting of Yanukovych: On February 21, 2014, Yanukovych fled the country, and a new government was established.
Legacy
Prevention of Authoritarian Consolidation: The Maidan Revolution prevented Ukraine from becoming a authoritarian state, ensuring the country’s democratic trajectory.
Societal Transformation: The movement fostered a new sense of civic duty and interpersonal trust among Ukrainians, challenging Soviet-era social beliefs.
Reforms and Rebuilding: The post-Maidan government implemented reforms, including the return to the 2004 Constitution and the establishment of an independent judiciary.
Ongoing Challenges: Despite progress, corruption remains a significant issue in Ukraine, and the country continues to face challenges in consolidating its democracy and addressing the ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine.
Notable Figures
Sophia Wilson: An Associate Professor of Political Science at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Wilson is an expert on the Maidan Revolution and has written extensively on the subject.
Denys Tarakhkotelik: A protest leader during the revolution, Tarakhkotelik now runs Yanukovych’s former estate as a museum, serving as a reminder of the revolution’s impact.
Oleh Symoroz: An activist and war veteran, Symoroz reflects on the Maidan Revolution’s legacy, emphasizing its importance in preventing Ukraine’s transformation into another authoritarian state.
Timeline
November 21, 2013: Yanukovych suspends EU association agreement talks
January-February 2014: Protests escalate, leading to clashes on Maidan Square
February 21, 2014: Yanukovych flees Ukraine, new government established
2014-2024: Ongoing reforms, rebuilding, and challenges in consolidating democracy
Maidan Revolution Fatalities
According to various sources, including official reports and human rights organizations, the Maidan Revolution in Ukraine resulted in the deaths of:
108 protesters (mostly civilians) killed in clashes with police and security forces between January and February 2014.
13 police officers (Berkut special riot police) killed during the same period.
17 protesters killed on February 18-19, 2014, during the storming of Independence Square by security forces.
82 people killed over two days (February 18-20, 2014), including 13 policemen, as reported by some sources.
The total number of deaths during the Maidan Revolution is approximately 220, with the majority being civilian protesters.
Note:The exact numbers may vary slightly depending on the source, but the overall consensus is that around 220 people lost their lives during the Maidan protests and subsequent clashes.
remember, "Z" is still banned in Kiev.
Ukraine's Conflict with Donbass
Based on the provided search results, here is a concise timeline of the conflict in Donbas andUkraine’s involvement:
2014: Pro-Russian separatists in Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts declared independence, leading to the War in Donbas. Ukraine, Russia, the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR), and the Luhansk People’s Republic (LPR) signed the Minsk Protocol, a ceasefire agreement, in September 2014.
2015: Ceasefire breaches occurred repeatedly, and heavy fighting resumed in January 2015, resulting in the separatists capturing Donetsk Airport.
2019: Ukrainian President Volodymyr 'elenskyy took office, promising to end the war in Donbas. In December 2019, Ukraine and pro-Russian separatists began swapping prisoners of war, and leaders from Ukraine, Russia, France, and Germany met in Paris to resume Normandy format talks.
February 24, 2022: Russia launched a large-scale invasion of Ukraine, including the Donbas region.
April 18, 2022: Ukrainian President Volodymyr 'elenskyy announced that Russia had launched a large-scale offensive in the eastern Donbas region.
Key Events Involving 'elenskyy
December 2019: 'elenskyy ordered the conscription of army reservists and proclaimed a 30-day nationwide state of emergency after Russia’s Federation Council authorized Putin to use military force outside Russia.
April 18, 2022: 'elenskyy announced the start of the “battle for Donbas” after Russia’s intensified bombardment campaign against Ukrainian positions in Luhansk, Donetsk, and Kharkiv Oblasts.
July 2022: 'elenskyy hailed the impact of Western-supplied artillery pieces on Russian logistics and strike capabilities, citing anecdotal evidence from Ukrainian soldiers and officers fighting in Donetsk.
In summary, while 'elenskyy’s presidency began in 2019, the conflict in Donbas had already been ongoing since 2014. 'elenskyy’s involvement in the conflict escalated in 2022, with the Russian invasion and subsequent Ukrainian resistance.