Anonymous ID: 6ed2e9 Sept. 26, 2024, 6:27 a.m. No.21660724   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0745 >>0775 >>1087 >>1357

Supermodel Naomi Campbell has been disqualified as a trustee after an investigation into her Fashion For Relief charity uncovered 'serious mismanagement'.

It follows revelations by the Mail On Sunday that official accounts showed that it spent more than £1.6million on a glittering gala in Cannes, but gave just £5,000 to good causes over a 15-month period.

The Charity Commission confirmed in April that it had removed the supermodel's charity from the UK charity register while it continued its investigation into allegations of misconduct.

And today the Commission published the report of its statutory inquiry into Fashion For Relief, concluding the charity was poorly governed and had inadequate financial management.

Campbell, 54, was disqualified from being a trustee for five years, former colleagues Bianka Hellmich for nine and Veronica Chou for four.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13894225/Naomi-Campbell-disqualified-trustee-watchdog-probe-Fashion-Relief-charity.html

Anonymous ID: 6ed2e9 Sept. 26, 2024, 6:40 a.m. No.21660818   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1087 >>1357

When it comes to Kamala Harris and her record on gun control, one can’t help but raise an eyebrow at her aggressive stance during her tenure as District Attorney of San Francisco. Her support for Proposition H, a city-level proposition aimed at banning the possession of handguns, is a glaring example of her willingness to infringe upon the rights of law-abiding citizens.

The Mercury News reported in 2005, “Although Mayor Gavin Newsom has not taken a position, several of the city’s most liberal leaders are supporting the far-reaching ban — including District Attorney Kamala Harris and four supervisors who are listed as sponsors.”

This statement underscores the political climate in San Francisco, where liberal leaders like Harris were eager to push their anti-gun agenda.

The ban, which required city residents to surrender all handguns within a mere four months, was a blatant overreach. The New York Post noted that the measure was “approved by San Francisco voters on Election Day 2005, but struck down by state courts before it could take effect.”

It’s telling that even the courts recognized the potential for this ban to violate fundamental rights.

But Harris didn’t stop there. On September 18, 2024, Breitbart News highlighted another alarming aspect of her approach to gun control. While serving as San Francisco DA, she supported firearm storage regulations that essentially allowed police to invade the privacy of citizens’ homes under the guise of compliance checks.

Kamala Harris said, “…just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home… doesn’t mean that we’re not going to walk into that home and check to see if you’re being responsible and safe in the way you conduct your affairs.”

 

https://thelibertydaily.com/as-san-francisco-da-kamala-harris-pushed-all/