Anonymous ID: 090eee Sept. 26, 2024, 11:34 a.m. No.21662052   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2059

>>21661363

>>>21658945 Kamala Harris was the prosecutor against Michael Jackson in California

 

F&G

Zero evidence given other than two spearate intervies cobbled together from two differnt networks. DJT was talking about the alleged victim's mother in his interview.

 

Kamala Harris was not involved in MJ's trial, she was merely speaking to a news outlet as a 'legal expert.' Kamala was San Francisco District Attorney at the time.

 

Thomas William Sneddon Jr. He is best known for leading two investigations of Michael Jackson on child sexual abuse allegations in 1993 and 2005. His most famous case was when he was prosecuting child molestation charges against Jackson in the trial People v. Jackson in 2005, at the end of which Jackson was acquitted.

 

In 2003, Jackson was charged by the state of California with molestation and other counts.

The final three files—62D-LA-236081, 252B-IR-6808, and 305B-LA-239205—detail the Bureau’s support to local law enforcement during the ensuing investigation. The first of these files describes an FBI response to a Los Angeles Police Department request to analyze computers and digital media obtained from Jackson’s home under court warrant. The second involves a request by the Santa Barbara County District Attorney for help and guidance from behavioral analysts in the FBI’s Critical Incident Response Group. In the last of the three files, an FBI agent from Los Angeles traveled to New York to interview a potential witness. The agent found this individual unwilling to cooperate and closed the matter. The case went to court in 2005, and Jackson was acquitted of all charges.

 

https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/stories/2009/december/jackson_122209

Anonymous ID: 090eee Sept. 26, 2024, 11:37 a.m. No.21662059   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>21662052

Although Kamala Harris held the position of Deputy City Attorney in San Francisco during this period, she was not directly engaged in prosecuting or overseeing the legal proceedings of Jackson's case. Harris's commentary on the case, offered in her capacity as a legal analyst, focused on the broader issue of child testimony's impact in such trials. Her expert insights, highlighted in a 2004 ABC News interview, shed light on the persuasive nature of child testimony in courtrooms. While her remarks were not specific to Michael Jackson's culpability, they provided valuable observations on the legal process.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYCNogzrG9M