Where is your TRIP code?
> Iโm not Q
My apologies for this.
Then can you please explain to me why you are posting here with a Qp?
That's because there is already a Q here in QR, and if I use Q's name here, it's going to be hard to find him, isn't it?
In no small part, I would agree.
>>21665225 edit
Don't you think that using the name Q in QR makes it harder to find Q here and QR?
I'd like to see your brilliant theory, so please create your own board and post it there, as it will interfere with QR's Q here.
I look forward to seeing your brilliant theory.
How would you mourn if someone said this to you?
There is a search function in 8kun, yes?
If you make the board I can catch a glimpse of your brilliant theory in an instant!
I wanted to share with you the best way to post it because I want to see what a great theory you have.
Because you complain here that you were erased.
Then just post it somewhere where it won't be erased.
If your theory is great, maybe it will be shared, and more importantly, how do you plan to use it?
Did you think you were safe inside the Internet?
Is it possible that someone else erased it instead of Jim or Ron?
Ah yes.
Your theory must be so brilliant that it might have been erased by a three-letter agency.
So you were not in possession of the data of this important thing yourself?
Didn't Q mention the importance of archive?
So what is this trying to claim?
Doesn't it matter what you are accomplishing now, whether you were here at the beginning or later?
Why?
If a person who has been called a good person commits a crime at this very moment, what effect will that have?
Ok, let's start that proof right away!
I am very much looking forward to it!
This is not the time to talk about it!
Just tell us where you are going to present it!
Wait a minute!
I remember you saying you were a man of great theories.
So I would to see your wonderful theory!
>>21665331
Yay!
I seem to have acquired the speed of a robot.
I don't care if you've been around since the beginning of this movement, show me the great theories you've learned from it!
Maybe it will lead to someone's awakening!
Maybe it will spawn a new idea!
No, I don't really care if it's larp or not.
I'd rather see the great theory he claims to have?
Let him tell us about it.
It doesn't matter if it is a failure.
I want to see what he has learned.
That would be a roadmap for someone, wouldn't it?
Let's take a look.
But this place could get in the way of bakers and anons, so by all means, why not catalog it?
I told him that this was the case,
He really wants to post it here.
Why is that?
What? You said it, didn't you?
No?
Then let's just go with your wonderful proof๏ผ
Come on, speak quickly.
You can still post now, so take a chance!
Perhaps a salt rotation panic?
You say you have been here for years and can make great posts.
But that it will or has been erased.
So do you understand my suggestion that you build your own catalog once so that you can post them reliably?
That said it might create confusion if your name is posted in QR in Qp
Well, it's just a name, so maybe there is no such problem,
Also, while I think past posts and your proofs are interesting, don't you think it would create clutter in this General where current and up-to-date information is flowing?
If that is the case, why don't you propose to create a thread specific to QR BO first?
If you make it out of the blue, it could be deleted.
But it is possible, isn't it?
because it may be content that may not be appropriate here.
But if you think it is so important, why don't you share the information elsewhere, if not here?
If someone thinks your post is important, isn't that fine?
Wouldn't it be great to have a catalog that gives a glimpse of what you've learned?
If your stuff is legendary, maybe you can join the LEGACY board?(I don't know.)
In any case, I think cataloging is a great performance in preserving what you think is important,
I don't think this is a division, but an expansion.
>>21665588
Enough about others, let's talk about your proof.
Or are you here to label others and this space?
>>21665595
Aww, I took you seriously, but you guys don't dialogue with me properly.
>>21665613
Is that your wonderful proof constructive to the world?
21665625
What are you projecting against?