>>21672451

[Did you use THEORY enough to make that sophistry disappear?]

>>21672487

[Do you try to distinguish between them?]

[I just see facts and events as they are and give them names only later]

>>21672498 edit

[I just see facts and events as are and give them names only later]

>>21672507

> 18 USC 1001b makes LIES into FACTS and FACTS INTO LIARS

[Are saying that chose a false fact to be the truth?]

>>21672512

[Are you talking about the definitions that doctors have made up?]

>>21672534

[Or have chosen to be truthful]

>>21672548

Why?

>>21672561

Of course it was because Baker thought it was a good post, right?

>>21672581

I think it would be a good thing for the person who pointed this out to explain what kind of mistakes were made.

Wouldn't explaining why you felt the way you did lead to better possibilities?

I would to know your insights.

>>21672599

I see.

Thanks for the explanation.

If you really think that Baker's choice is a problem, then maybe we can further prove that it is a problem.

I have no idea yet.

>>21672095

[tyb]

[o7]

[P.S]

[][>][Is this starting to catch on?]

[HAHAHA]

>>21672616

What?

Did I point out any problems?

>>21672616 edit

~~we~~

>>21672608

>>21672646

>>21672644

What?

I said if you think it's a problem, try explaining it more.

You don't get it?

Then don't worry about it!

>>21672665

I'm fine!

Thanks for the reply!

I guess I didn't communicate well to you either.

>>21672684

cool