Not seeing it at all, sorry. Not the same body frame and Miller does not look 58.
>You said so yourself in the 3rd line of your post, but if you've talked yourself out of it, then it is what it is.
Huh? I said Stephen Miller looks like JFK Jr?
When? Where?
Nice digits. Speaking of Huxley…
https://archive.org/details/AldousHuxley–TheUltimateRevolution–ABlueprintToEnslaveTheMasses
Aldous Huxley gave this speech to a Berkley audience, in which he admits that his novels such as "Brave New World" were not just fiction, but real blueprints for types of controlled and enslaved societies.
A shocking look at the results of the Fabian Society and the Cecil Rhodes Round Table efforts to resurrect the British empire, control of the United States, and dominate the planet. This is similar to the work of H. G. Wells, also a Fabian Society / Round Table insider, and his works of futurism which entail the enslavement of society. His works also were not entertainment or merely theoretical, as he points out in his book "The New World Order." Wells more or less defected and tried to warn the world. But his books meant to warn the ordinary person were mostly destroyed, and unavailable until recently (see PDFs below.
"There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution."
Aldous Huxley, Tavistock Group, California Medical School, 1961
Beautiful work, Anon.
>have you noticed that R never posts in here?
Yes, indeed I have.
>But obviously, R doesn't want this to be "his" special platform.
>Seems he wants to stay with the crowd at the main board.
>So, lets not make too much of this SIDE board.
Exactly. And I don't get the sense he wants or needs a special "fan" club. R has posted for us, not we for him.
>Rules don't work!
KEK and AMEN. This reminded me of a formula a family therapist once told me in regard to rules:
Rules Without Relationships Spell Rebellion
This is an online anonymous forum where Free Speech reigns. By the mere fact we are "anonymous," we cannot presume to have an authentic and committed relationship with each other. Sure, there are certain anons with whom we feel an affinity, with whom we resonate and even recognize by their syntax and sentiments. But that does not mean we have a true enough of a relationship with each other to agree upon, much less uphold, "rules".
>It's NICE when people can find a voice here who wouldn't dare yet to post on the main board.
>And it's also NICE if some people want to help newfags gently one by one.
>And it's NICE to have this place to compile R specific digging.
>But, please, no more than that.
Exactly. People ARE generally nicer (and better behaved) when you don't try to impose rules.
I can feel your frustration, anon. And I actually am pretty sure I recognize you from way back in the early days.
If I am correct, you have always strived to be trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and reverent.
To these virtues I would also add "very well organized."
(Kek, I have always pictured you as a very effective and scrupulous accountant or administrator.)
Don't leave us, anon. You have too much too offer. Just bend a little and go with the flow. And your ideas are actually not bad – it's just the way they're worded.
Instead of "rules," call them suggestions. Rephrase to make more palatable. Change negative statements like "Do NOT" to "Please do" or "You might try".
Lastly, anon. The times they are a changin. I think old fags like you and I need to reflect where and how our time and energies are best directed toward The Great Awakening.
xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxo (YOU)