>>21678003 PB
I was merely stating a fact.
qresearch is not a free speech platform, and I gave an example why.
But instead of seeing the logic in my statement, your kneejerk reaction was to go full muhjoo.
Right leaning people are more principled.
Left leaning people seem to be more malleable.
But once the Left has been brainwashed and molded into their beliefs, they are headstrong, and a logical argument doesn't work with them.
The Right, on the other hand, seem more willing to see both sides of an argument and have a higher level of discernment.
If I have a differing opinion that another person on the Right, we can have a meaningful discussion and compare our differing points of view.
If I talk to someone on the Left, I feel like I am talking in circles and end up just walking away from them because their sense of logic is non-existent.
The Right, therefore, imo, are more apt to appreciate freedom of speech because they are interest in alternate viewpoints.
The Left, imo, are only interested in echo chambers.
On qresearch, we have a cornucopia of alternate views to explore, except for some reason when the word "Jew" of "Jewish" is mentioned. That is verboten. That is why I say qresearch is NOT a free speech platform.
So many dirty tricks.
Now in Chicago, they are calling it regentrification.
I lived within the City Limits in the 1960s but was railroaded out by violent Black Gangs who took over entire Lower/Middleclass neighborhoods. Those neighborhoods turned into what we call "bad neighborhoods" filled with crime.
But now they are boohooing when a developer comes in and bulldozes an area and transforms it into what it used to be.
>this isn't your board to control
I never said it was.
It is controlled and censored by someone other than myself. They can do what they want. If they want to censor, they can, but it is Censorship when posts that aren't spam are deleted. If the person in control doesn't like that an anon uses the word "Jew" or "Jewish" and deletes that post, that is censorship.
qresearch is controlled and censored.
>I don't think the freedom to infringe on the freedom of others is freedom.
Agree.
There is an apartment building across the street from me that put in very bright lights that shine right into my house every night.
Do they have the freedom to install lights. Yes.
But don't I also have the freedom to live in a house that doesn't have obnoxious bright lights shining into it every night?
Where is the line when your freedoms are negatively affecting someone else's?
It's not about whose board it is.
It's just a matter of fact that qresearch is not a free speech platform.
GAB has more freedom of speech than quresearch.
GAB does not censor people who use the word "Jew" or "Jewish."
But GAB is a honeypot.
Everyone who endorses Kamala, is compromised.
Nice trick.
Even the Devil can quote scripture.
Consider the agenda of the person who is quoting the scripture.
This isn't about insults.
This is about Free Speech.
Beautiful words are not always Truthful.
Truthful words are not always Beautiful.
Grow a pair.