I don't think the freedom to infringe on the freedom of others is freedom.
Isn't it important to consider which choice offers the most freedom?
I think it is the claims and arguments that will be important here.
Because a person's behavior may affect someone else.
I think that the way feel about matters varies from person to person.
I think that the true best state of affairs can be found by searching for that boundary.
I partly agree and partly am not sure.
I find it very easy to identify the enemy.
But the trickiest part is when they are pretending to be good guys and when they are ignorant.
Isn't it normal to have friction when interacting with such people?
I think it's up to each of us to feel condescended to or not.
It's also up to each of us whether or not we are hurt by it, the degree to which we are hurt by it, and the point at which we are offended by it.
I am here because I am part of this movement.
Is this environment run by personal ideology?
I think this place is made up of the consciousness of many participants in this movement.