Anonymous ID: b3ae17 Oct. 1, 2024, 6:37 a.m. No.21688456   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8467 >>8468

>>21688433

Something dirty would be my guess, if I had to make one. But that's just speculation, the whole strike being cover for a preventative measure is just speculation. If that's what it is though, they're watching for something, or they're clearing out the docks and they're looking for something in the shipping containers, that scenario popped into the head too.

Anonymous ID: b3ae17 Oct. 1, 2024, 6:52 a.m. No.21688526   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21688491

>That's the problem with this entitled country.

You came to QResearch to one post and virtue signal you're helping your neighbors? Trying to belittle everyone else based upon your viewpoint and recent experiences and then trying to drag God into it to try and give it strength? I think you're full of shit and just another shill fishing for (You)s.

Anonymous ID: b3ae17 Oct. 1, 2024, 7:13 a.m. No.21688637   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8653 >>8654

>>21688616

He uses that excuse constantly. The only one that does too and the only one it seems to happen to. It's blatantly obvious he thinks the ambiguity of anonymity here to be enough for his bullshit to pass the sniff test but he's cried wolf one too many times for me to believe his bullshit. It's an NPC reflex at this point to cover his ass.

Anonymous ID: b3ae17 Oct. 1, 2024, 7:31 a.m. No.21688709   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8718

>>21688587

There's moar indication that it's the FIB, C_A, and their contractors than Israel. Why is it the shills displaying the very degeneracy, continually I might add, that they accuse an entire ethnicity of? Using their own logic, applied to their own actions, would mean that they're the evil Jews that they're trying to demonize. All for division and control. It's the Satanist retards, those that hide amongst every ethnicity like a cancer, slowly rotting it from the inside. It's you, it's not who you say it is.

Anonymous ID: b3ae17 Oct. 1, 2024, 7:42 a.m. No.21688741   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21688731

>What are you on about? It would be helpful if you provided some context, or quoted whoever you were replying to.

Don't worry too much about it. If you can't answer the last question in that post then that post isn't for you. You're not Q.