Anonymous ID: fc9be5 Oct. 3, 2024, 11:16 a.m. No.21702530   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2536 >>2539

>>21702527

2/2

The refusal by roughly two dozen Republicans to elect him as speaker last year was the impetus for Jordan to get serious, spending time away from Washington campaigning for Republicans and cutting fundraising checks to colleagues for the first time.

 

This cycle, Jordan has given to 23 Republicans representing swing districts since October 2023 — when Jordan lost his speakership race — through June 2024, which is the last time campaign finance reports were filed to the Federal Election Commission.

 

One of the people Jordan donated to for the first time is Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.), a moderate who represents a district Biden won by more than 6 percent in 2020. Bacon voted against Jordan for speaker last year and received threatening phone calls and emails because of it, an episode that further soured their already frosty relationship.

Now, Bacon says he’s appreciative of Jordan’s financial support this year. “I’m grateful to him,” he said.(so they have to buy them off to get support, congress is a freakin mess)

 

Jordan has shocked many pragmatic Republicans who supported his candidacy — including moderate Rep. Dave Joyce (R), a fellow Ohioan — by cutting checks for their campaigns for the first time. Jordan also donated to Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.), an influential committee chairman, who was challenged by a far-right candidate supported in the primary by the Freedom Caucus’s political arm.

 

Jordan has also been campaigning for members, who often invite him to their districts to rile up the GOP base.

 

“I think Jim’s perspective [is] if Trump is president and we have a slim majority, he could be the right conduit and protection between those two — our body in the slim majority and the MAGA Republican constituency. And I would say that he’s intimated that without saying it,” Molinaro said earlier this year.

 

It would be quite the pivot. Jordan was elected in his conservative district in 2006. In his first term, he led a group of antiestablishment Republicans to tank President George W. Bush’s Wall Street bailout during the 2008 financial crisis. He sharpened his claws on conservative media and built a reputation as a foil not only against Democrats, but also against leadership in his own party.

 

In 2015, he co-founded the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus to represent a new generation of rugged, just-say-no Republicans who blocked compromise, pressured two GOP speakers — Paul D. Ryan (Wis.) and John Boehner (Ohio) — to resign, and refused to help his less dogmatic Republican colleagues win reelection, including by refusing to pay mandatory dues to the House Republicans’ campaign arm.

 

Not everyone will be ready to work with him. Some Republicans still remain irate and may not ever support him in leadership because of how he comported himself during the last speakership election.After a bitter falling out during the speakership fight last year, Jordan refused to fully endorse Scalisewhen the conference elected their majority leader to succeed McCarthy, which prompted a backlash among ardent Scalise allies. And Jordan’s allies on the Hill and across conservative media made matters worse by threatening lawmakers to vote against the Ohio congressman for speaker, some of whom received death threats for their opposition. Jordan denounced the threats at the time.

 

Others just don’t trust Jordan given how he had notoriously shunned helping out his non-Freedom Caucus colleaguesthroughout his early career in Congress. His scorched-earth tactics and refusal to be a team player and contribute to the party’s campaign coffers drew the ire of many colleagues who believed that he contributed to Republican losses in close races. Those actions set the example for a larger crop of far-right members who still refuse to donate to the NRCC and now campaign against GOP colleagues in primary elections, helping to drive intraparty divisions.

But several lawmakers who were skeptical of him last year have become more open-minded about the idea because Jordan could play the role of messaging bulldog in the minority, especially if Vice President Kamala Harris becomes president.

 

“I never close the door on things,” said Rep. Carlos A. Gimenez (R-Fla.). “For me and Jordan, it was never personal. I just didn’t support him, that’s all.”

 

https://archive.is/JrhWP

 

(Congress operates like the mafia)

Anonymous ID: fc9be5 Oct. 3, 2024, 11:52 a.m. No.21702622   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2625

 

The dark side of Meta's smart glasses: Harvard students reveal how Mark Zuckerberg's creepy spectacles can be used to instantly find strangers' names and addresses

 

+

8

View gallery

05:40 EDT 03 Oct 2024, updated 10:15 EDT 03 Oct 2024

By Jonathan Chadwick For Mailonline

 

Engineers built the system with Meta's Ray Bans, facial recognition and AI

READ MORE: Facebook and Instagram users fume over Meta's AI move

Ever since Meta debuted its smart glasses back in 2021, concerns have been raised over their ability to film people without their knowledge.

 

Now, two Harvard students have taken the device's privacy-invading capabilities even further – by building a modified version called 'I-XRAY'.

 

The creepy system uses AI and facial recognition software to instantly dox people's identities.

 

In an astonishing clip, the students go up to random strangers and quickly identify their name and other personal details – including their home address, work history and even the names of parents.

 

It's reminiscent of the Black Mirror episode, White Christmas, where a hopeless singleton uses an implant to instantly find online information about strangers.

 

How does it work?

Video is streamed from the Meta smart glasses straight to Instagram.

 

A computer programme monitors the stream for people's faces and can match a face to publicly available images across the internet.

 

An AI is prompted to infer details such as the person's name, occupation, and other personal details.

 

The results are sent to a separate app the students created on their phone.

 

The tech has been created by AnhPhu Nguyen and Caine Ardayfio, two engineers at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

 

'The purpose of building this tool is not for misuse, and we are not releasing it,' they say in a document outlining the technology.

 

'Our goal is to demonstrate the current capabilities of smart glasses, face search engines, large language models and public databases.

 

'[We're] raising awareness that extracting someone's home address and other personal details from just their face on the street is possible today.'

 

On X (Twitter), Nguyen posted a video of the tech with the caption: 'Are we ready for a world where our data is exposed at a glance?'

 

As the students show in the clip, they use a combination of existing tech on the market to create AI glasses 'that reveal anyone's personal details just from looking at them'.

 

First, the students take a pair of Meta Ray Bans 2, released last year, 'as they look almost indistinguishable from regular glasses'.

 

At the touch of a button on the side of the specs, these glasses can film up to three minutes of live video, which can be streamed to Instagram.

 

In one instance, Ardayfio approaches a woman he'd never met before and asks: 'Are you Betsy? I think I met you through the Cambridge Community Foundation'.

 

Smiling, the woman – presumably believing she'd met him previously but forgotten about it – confirms she is indeed Betsy and they start a conversation.

 

Fortunately it is possible to remove your details from PimEyes and FastPeopleSearch so that I-XRAY or any similar system can't identify you.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-13919545/Meta-smart-glasses-Harvard-students.html

 

How is our government allowing these to be sold?

 

(The Daily mail is tracking everything you read and copy, a tracking alert comes up when you try to copy an article)