what did they say or do I have to do the click thing (which I'm not going to do)
remain free of being manipulated into giving you free clicks.
how hard would it be to tell us what they said but instead you pull out your insults.
Thank You
FEMA is "too tied up at the border to send any more representatives here"
whatever fatality numbers you are hearing "go ahead and add a couple of zeros"
I wrote about what I heard in the video, what did you do but just spit on the people here?
you're little insult applies to yourself.
you're talking to yourself.
90,000 is a lot of deaths.
I heard that In New Orleans the huge deathtoll was covered up.
more useless hateful stupid psyop noise
If they buy her the seat she won't last long.
how would they have the legal right to 'confiscate' someone's donations?
seems either the news is false or FEBA is behaving as criminals
the post is a sauceless rumor, anon.
he can't, can he?
so that's why I call it a 'rumor'.
I'm not saying it's not true, but we can't base conclusions about FEMA on it.
I for one don't need to see some hyper emtional psyop Television drama witch-lynching scene, anon.
that's why it's useless psyop noise: because there is no purpose for it here except to try and get people all worked up with bad television English TV psychologically manipulative fear porn like productions.
what I think?
after what I heard about Katrina and the bodies stacked up there (reported by a friend) and never heard that on the news I think that there are people in our Federal government who are capable of very horrible things.
but I don't have any proof so I don't want to say it IS like that. It does seem that way, though.
I am sad if it really is tens of thousands who were killed in N.C. anon.
that's what I think
If I glow I'm like the red-nosed reindeer: trying to bring light during the blizzard of misinformation.
the anon had taken the rumor and made it into a fact by making a declaritive statement about FEMA which while it might be true, we can't conclude that it is. Is it a false conclusion? We don't have enough information to say either way. So, yes, we don't just dismiss these reports but we don't use them as the basis for arguments either.
anon, the news is too serious to make light of it and suggest lynching people.
I thought it was a real news report and yes, I did very quickly react when I discovered that it was a clip from a hyper emtional crappy English psyop television series.
I apologize for being so quick with my statement but do you agree that we don't want people getting lynched no matter who they are?
people are spreading rumors and then drawing false conclusions from those rumors and suggesting lynching.
NO, anon, you stop with the BS
you aren't allowed to criticise the maxist anchor baby spawn from Ukraine who all have noses that look the same
Irene in Vermont was similar.
People had seen it before.
they have large dams way off in the mountains that helped but didn't prevent the devastation.
the loss of life wasn't as large, but the flooding was huge.
oh, I didn't say 'facetious satire'.
of course you can and should criticize such people when they violate the rights of others.
maybe if you read the news and didn't misrepresent the facts you'd not be so reactionary.
The strike is delayed until Jan 15
the missle attack didn't really do much.
Tel Aviv is in a war zone and Israelis destroy whole countries and depopulate places so they have to expect some kind of blow back.
usually no criticism is needed.
the bad ones are so obvious in their bias that no one needs to be told.
NOTABLE
you forgot the seeming proxy war by FEMA against hurricane victims.
I heard about it from a lineman who was there and independent.
He would tell anyone who would listen.
People just assumed he was making it up but I knew him better and didn't think that.
I agree. Elon publishing this is sauce enough for me.
PS: the group you mention that is supposedly doing some against the country you like is actually the spy agencies of that country posting stuff to play the victim.
maybe I should say 'most likely' or 'probably' just to make it not seem like a foregone conclusion because who could ever know such things except through observation?
part of the reason welfare was set up is so that the Ukrainigarchs could have their children grow up in 'poverty' fully funded and then get their trust funds when they finished a fully-paid-for college education.
this option was often taken.
you're just grasping.
slavers are slavers.
King Richard? really?
you probably know who they are and what they are and yet you pretend like it's others.
what is obvious is obvious.
History from 1000 years ago doesn't really matter now, it's just a deflection by you.
you are right, ancient traditions are important and of course History matters.
what I meant to say 'you deflecting to History is of no importance to this discussion.
suggesting 'finishing' the muslims isn't 'sarcasm' anon. It's a psychopathic statement by an instigator pretending to be ? what?
irony?
no, clearly just instigation.
the children of Trotsky and the Ukrainigarch marxists wreck havoc and you pretend suggesting genocide against muslims is 'irony' or 'sarcasm' and I'm suppose to just believe you.
I hit the nail on the head and one of Trotsky kin starts name calling.
I have no way to know if that guy is Trotsky's kin. I say that because I figure it will bug them that I know so much about the history of their operation.
how rediculous.
how can I know what psyops you are running while I'm sleeping?
and how does that make me what you called me?
can you do anything except name call?
have you nothing real to offer?
useful idiots of Marxist revolutions are usually elliminated by the new governance within a decade so you should be careful who you are backing in this conflict.
a meaningless charge.
if what you claim were true that no one has the right to discuss stuff, then the bringing up of King Richard was off base too.
your argument is fatally flawed. you're stabbing in the dark with it.