Anonymous ID: 029421 July 16, 2018, 5:35 a.m. No.2172853   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2855 >>2972

https://www.mikehuckabee.com/latest-news?id=b8125367-c733-4401-a37c-bd70b2452b23

 

>>But Robinson goes on to address another aspect of this case: namely, how unlikely it is that an objective grand jury could be empaneled in Washington, DC, for a case against congressional Democrats charged with something as serious as (perhaps) treason. The same would go for prosecutors and judges assigned to such a case. She reminds us that with all the evidence against the FBI presented in the IG report, the Inspector General left out that same part: the prosecution part. โ€œDo you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?โ€ she asks.

 

 

So, if itโ€™s not going to be handled in DC, where WILL it be handled? Robinson suggests that itโ€™s moving from DC to Utah, under U.S. Attorney John Huber, who was selected by Attorney General Sessions to handle cases related to the IG report. Remarkably, Huber operates with a staff of 470 investigators, far exceeding the investigative power of a special counsel. One other possibility, if the cases relating to Awan include allegations of treason or other matters of national security, is that they will be tried in a military court, away from the media and the chance of compromising sensitive information, sources or methods. That lessens the likelihood that any โ€œbig fishโ€ will get away on a technicality.

 

Huber might be getting Awan case. If treasons involved going to military trial.