What kind of shit do they have on Walz that would make him go this far? It's gotta be juicy AF.
>>21735174
>pls repost meme so i can snag a copy before the ADL COMPED POS BV can delete it again
Kek. Which meme?
>>21735197
>the one with potato in the center surrounded by kikes and yids
Don't have that one, Anon. Sorry. It's really killing them they can't stop the signal anymore. Normies are awake AF about the Chosen Ones™. Hearing a lot of chatter about Mayorkas from Lefties I know. They noticed, after Helene.
>Deep state clowns hiding behind their broken narrative of bigotry.
Kek. Indeed, My Fellow White Person™. Curious, but what do you have to say about all the Jews pretending to be White to spread anti-White rhetoric and incite violence against non-Jewish Whites? Or do they get a free pass 'cos they're the Chosen Ones™?
>>21735217
Lame. That's a fuckingfractionof the Kosher Cabinet™. Why on earth would the BO crew delete factual information? /s
>Can't even mention the Jew, but Niggers of all stripes are A-OK.
You can make disparaging remarks about Asians, Whites, Muslims, Christians, et al. You're not allowed to talk about the Chosen Ones™ in any capacity, no matter how minute, unless it's in the positive. Fags have no idea how many people really lurk here.
>>21735242
Oy vey! You all earned an anti-Semitisms™. You keep it up and they'll send you to Yeshiva for re-education.
>so post a more complete meme, why dontcha?
Why don't you? I'm actually busy at the moment, but I know POTATUS' Cabinet was a lot more kosher™. NCSWIC.
>when ron used to post here didn't he once track the lurkers and post a figure of 350,000,000?
Kek. I thought it was in the gorillions? Or is that now? This place was way better when 8Bit was running the show. Hell, even OSS was better at this point.
Kek. That's 2. 3 moar and you're going to Yeshiva, Anon. They're going to make you fuck a wall.
Kek.
>It's very clearly a tropical storm they are trying to use as a screen to fuq w/FL.
Same thing they did with Beryl. Beryl was a TS, never a Hurricane. Wheels was in on that shit. Conveniently out of town in Asian, setting up Asian-Texas business for after he leaves office. Wanted to make sure he got his part of the shekels.
>Anon's life has been a living hell for the past 8 years. It never fucken ends. Fuck.
Embrace the suck, Anon.
>some Zionists are just sick individuals
Link him this video and ask him what he thinks of Jews pretending to be White to spread anti-White rhetoric and incite hatred and violence towards non-Jewish Whites. 99% sure you're going to enjoy his response and it will be a deflection. I'd do it myself, were Inotstill persona non grata under Musk's X.
>Jean-Pierre
Knows she's a willing participant in the Biden regime, which makes her actions treasonous. She's scurred and stupid. She should have walked away while she could. Nut Psaki may skim charges, feigning ignorance. JP won't be so lucky.
>So Marjorie Taylor Greene can lie about weather control
Where exactly did she "lie" about weather control, Anon? Or are you like Loomer and Silverman and misconstrued her use of "They" out of paranoia and hubris?
>Free speech is not free license to be a menace, even anonymously.
Kek. You mean like pretending to be White, when you're Jewish to spread anti-White hate? See: >>21735661 When people like (you) come out and condemn this type of behavior, then we can talk about being a "menace." Or are you saying that these people deserve a free pass, for being moar special than everyone else, 'cos their invisible deity, whom only they follow, says so?
>Another anon put it beautifully last night that they're just like children laying on the floor stamping their hands and feet and having a tantrum that they're not getting their way.
Kek. Now do Israel.
>And the funny thing is they could have their own way on their own board on 8kun, but no one would go their but them, so they stay here to continually fuck with the board and the anons here.
Or you could make your own board, right? Tit for tat? If it's okay for them to make their own board, you can make your one, correct? See you want to force an angle, but you only want to adhere to it, when it suits (you). You don't want to play when your own angle is used against you. Free speech is free speech, Anon. Warts and all.
>Removing spam and/or propaganda designed to drown out everyone else is not censorship, that's taking out the trash and cleaning the pool
Defined bywhom, Anon? Who are (you) to decide what is or isn't spam/propaganda?
>repetition & experience with it
>defines what is spam/propaganda
Again, Anon, who are (you) to decide? What you're doing is an opine. You don't like it, filter. Simple as. You want to control the message for others. Every person has the right to believe and say whatever they want. That's what free speech is. You don't want free speech. You want to control the narrative that(YOU)like, irrespective of another's opinion.
That makes you a dangerous individual.
>When 1 Ip repeats the same messaging more that 20% of the Bread
Again, not your place. Are you BO or one of the BVs? If so, I can show you several instances of censorship for innocuous poasts. You don't want to go there, I'm sure.
>It's spam/Propaganda, forever
Again, that's (YOUR) opinion. Why is this concept so hard to grasp for you? If you don't like what someone says, fucking filter. Just 'cos you think something is spam/propaganda doesn't make it true, for another, but you've made it quite clear that you are moar than willing to silence a voice that you disagree with, without a single consideration of another's opinion. You'renotAnon.
>It's a "my voice is more important than anyone else" mentality
Kek. Which is exactly what you are doing, ID10-T and I'm trying toTELLyou. If someone says something you don't like or disagree with,ignorethem and move on! You're not completely oblivious. You have an agenda and it's disingenuous.
>who is he to decide?
>is he the one doing the deleting?
If people are deleting your shit, Anon, you keep poasting it. Make them fuckingworkfor their money.
>he gave a valid definition and you call him 'dangerous'
He doesn't get to define what is and what isnotfree speech. That seems to be a problem that the majority of individuals do not comprehend.
>are you one of those who repeats the same foul messaging post to post?
Kek. Again, define foul messaging? What you consider "foul" may not be to someone else, so who the fuck are(YOU)to demand they be censored for something (YOU) do not like? If you don't like it, filter.
>look at you: 'dangerous individual' you say, for someone merely defining the issue of spam.
One man's rubbish is another's treasure, Anon. Again, use the fucking filter and quit kvetching about something (you) have absolutelynocontrol over.
>you out yourself as being a slanderer.
For fuck's sake, Anon. Grow a fucking brian and learn the difference between slander and libel. (picrel)
>all you have is name calling and slander.
slander
noun
-
the action or crime of making a falsespokenstatement damaging to a person's reputation
libel
noun
-
apublishedfalse statement that is damaging to a person's reputation; awrittendefamation