>>21762011

Is america really ready to go down the football rabbit hole?

Do they really want to drag out of the closet all the secret gay men in football?

Do they want to have an honest discussion about Hockey and baseball's secret gay sub culture?

Do you think that Tim Walz is the only thirty something guy who want to hang around with teenage boys?

Do you really think that every gay guy who is in sports is a pedophile creep? (they aren't)

America doesn't want to have the discussion.

Walz, if he did what is said, is a creep.

but I know that there must be plenty of gay men who make great coaches and aren't looking to have relationships with the boys/young men who they coach.

And a lot of the time these guys are married with kids and pillars of their communities.

The attraction is an issue, yes.

Acting on the attraction is the problem.

Someone who has that kind of attraction was probably groomed into it as a young man or adolescent.

America doesn't really want to know about it.

We want to pretend it's just all about sports.

or how these jacked up roid head guys are often recruited to be bait boys for black mail : does America really want to know about this?

>>21762029

did he?

and how is that going to matter at the ballot box?

>>21762043

no, anon, most adults get to a part where their charitable love tames their craven lust.

but the ones who don't justify their cravenness by pretending 'It's just the way humans are'.

>>21762051

you're a slanderer and a nasty shill.

men do what men do and they are all different.

each person has his own issues.

what you don't know is you not learning or observing.

what do you think I'm saying?

the fact: there are plenty of college roid-head muscle guys who are recruited into gay-sex with old men for the purposes of blackmail.

it doesn't have to be a high percentage.

as far as what you accuse me of: you're a nasty slanderer and owe me and apology for saying that, as you have no information about me at all.

>>21762058

your violent ideas are clearly your ideas.

and as far as what you imagine: you put what one does as if it represents all.

Most people tame their urges and do not devolve into craven behavior, violence, rape, and theivery.

and the ones who don't justify their craven ways by pretending 'all you hypocrits would do the same thing if you could get away with it.'

blind to virtue, and unaware of God's influence, you slander the rest of humanity.

and I do mean you.

>>21762086

when using language the use of subjects and objects is often put into the clauses that present ideas.

'the taming is not working !' you say.

but is that really true when you look at individuals.

some can tame themselves.

others, sadly, can not.

and so the other aspect is that new people are always being born.

so while some do tame themselves and become adult and not criminal, many youngsters have NOT yet, or perhaps never will, tame themselves.

think of individual souls, anon.

Collectives don't all go to heaven based upon collective virtue.

some are taken, some are thrown back.

collectivization is a failure in term of thinking about the big picture of eternal life.

Each person is weighed and measured as an individual.

the virtue of a saint doesn't guarantee heaven for all those who love the saint.

>>21762130

?

that's a bit odd to say?

who is my post not kind of a prayer just for that?

in what way do you imagine that my posts lack empathy?

your post, in fact, seems to lack it, you're just grasping at straws about me.

>>21762178

constant reminder of difference day

constant marxist jingo day

constant grievance with no forgiveness day