Anonymous ID: 156441 July 16, 2018, 11:50 a.m. No.2176779   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6808

>>2176742

>POTUS didnt say it wasnt russia, he just says it wasnt collusion.

This only works if it ultimately points back to HRC working with Russians.

 

I don't think most Americans would accept the idea the Russians helped Trump win, but its all ok because there was no 'collusion'.

It would still make him guilty in public opinion.

 

Trump has to flip the script and show it was actually HRC and possibly rogue Russian elements. Or, our own IC pretending to be Russians.

Anonymous ID: 156441 July 16, 2018, noon No.2176881   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6914 >>7340

NRA are in latest indictment

Still reading… more here.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1080766/download

 

THIS seems potentially like another setup to paint the NRA as working with the Russians…

Anonymous ID: 156441 July 16, 2018, 12:43 p.m. No.2177339   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7350 >>7364 >>7373 >>7374 >>7376 >>7379 >>7381 >>7384 >>7385

Russian Coup

Uhh, guys. I think I found something really important.

Maria Butina wasn't representing Putin.

She was working for people hoping to replace Putin. Torshin?

 

This is it, guys. The thing that brings it all together.

The Russian's working to help Hillary are actually trying to oust Putin.

 

Hillary and our IC were working with rogue Russians.

Anonymous ID: 156441 July 16, 2018, 12:47 p.m. No.2177376   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2177339

>>2177340

The US Person 1 (from the NRA) was actually working to help her get rid of Putin.

 

It's the exact opposite of the narrative.

AND… clearly Butina was another ploy, to entrap people in the NRA and Trump team with emails that implicate them working with Russians, to support more wiretaps.

 

Did the NRA get a FISA too?