dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Anonymous ID: 40c68c July 16, 2018, 2:29 p.m. No.2178338 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>8384 >>8393 >>8466 >>8563 >>8629 >>8727 >>8743

If you ask me, the links at top of every General Research are focused way too much on proving Q is real and making connections with his drops, etc.

Shouldn't there be more of an emphasis on the actual topics and making proofs of the actual conspiracies and documenting the actual players in an easily understandable way?

>>2178079 (OP)

Threads & Research Section needs to be way more expansive and detailed than it is currently.

We need to make easily found resources documenting the facts of the conspiracies Q discusses as opposed to emphasizing how Q himself is real.

If I want to show a normalfag how DNC is corrupt, I need a link with all our digs on that topic, not a link showing him how Q is real.

>>2178393

>organising executive summaries for each subject

EXACTLY.

Imagine if there is a list of all topics with a link to executive summary with citations that are linked to our digs.

Then, for instance, when trump did russia press conference and references "where is the server?" I can go here, click on link for seth rich/dnc/fbi/hillary collusion and find executive summary with proofs we've dug linked.

That's what we need.

>>2178427

>>2178393

Good place to start would be finding summaries that are already made so we aren't doing the work twice. Voat for instance had some great ones on pizzagate.

Let's migrate those over here and improve them and make our own.

Anonymous ID: 40c68c July 16, 2018, 2:42 p.m. No.2178466 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>8743

>>2178452

>>2178384

>>2178338

>Indeed, good thinking. I think we have been attempting to counter the mockingbird narrative on Q, to start and what you're suggesting may be the next step. Feel free to suggest or do. Post also if you need any help. It's a big undertaking I understand, organising executive summaries for each subject.

Can we get BO and maybe CM's attention on this?

Think it will be a major enhancement to the board and movement.

>>2178479

>Sure. I was involved in the consolidation project at Voat PG, it was a huge undertaking. However, we have much more manpower and autism here I think, that subjects could be covered easily. IDK, we'd need support and serious organisimation.

Count me in on the project. Should we make a thread in the catalog as a work space?