>>>21782404 (You)
>That's an Anon, post, not a Q post; Q was replying to a person who had been posting for quite awhile in that thread claiming to have inside knowledge, and Q explicitly said that HRC WASN'T being arrested…
True Anon. I knew it was not a Q, that first one being replied to, but honestly never read it as a rebuttal of the claim of arrest, which it clearly is. It almost sounds like someone was trying to share info they didn't actually have, but thought they had and was same day/date. I've been here since way back then. Got me to thinking I should re-read all the posts.