🔥BREAKING: We have video evidence of what we’ve been saying all along. This hurricane was a LAND GRAB for the Lithium & White Quartz ⬇️
NC Gov. Roy Cooper says “Some areas you just shouldn’t build back…we’ve been able to convince people that BUYOUTS ARE BETTER‼️”
A leaked recording of Diddy doing what Diddy did to other consenting / non-consenting adults .
Its not pretty…use caution
What Is the DoD Preparing For With Its Directive 5240.01 Addition of the “Use of Lethal Force Against U.S. Citizens”
The right to support domestic law enforcement efforts, including the use of lethal force against US citizens under specific conditions, has been covertly given to the US military. Take into account that this modification was implemented only a few weeks prior to an election, when worries about civil liberties, unrest, and possible government overreach were already prevalent. DoD Directive 5240.01, which was reissued on September 27, 2024, reflects this reality.
New clauses:
The revised order broadens the scope of situations in which the Department of Defense may support law enforcement, particularly when it comes to the application of lethal force.
Although assassination is prohibited, the amended wording permits lethal acts in response to "imminent threats."
Given DHS's more expansive definition of domestic terrorism risks, the enlarged definition of "national security threats" is concerning.
https://www.diamondandsilkinc.com/tabletalknews/what-is-the-dod-preparing-for-with-its-directive-524001-addition-of-the-use-of-lethal-force-against-us-citizens-mnju7
doc link below
https://www.esd.whs.mil/portals/54/documents/dd/issuances/dodd/524001p.pdf
Judge rules evidence in Trump 2020 election case to be unsealed Friday
Update: Read about the newly unsealed evidence here.
Judge Tanya Chutkan on Thursday denied former President Donald Trump's request to delay until after the election the unsealing of court records and exhibits in the 2020 election interference case and said the court would release evidence submitted by the government on Friday.
In her five-page order, Chutkan said there was a presumption that there should be public access to "all facets of criminal court proceedings" and that Trump, in claiming the material should remain under seal, did not submit arguments relevant to any of the factors that would be considerations. Instead, Trump's lawyers argued that keeping it under seal for another month "will serve other interests," Chutkan wrote. "Ultimately, none of those arguments are persuasive."
moar here
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/judge-rules-evidence-in-trump-2020-election-case-to-be-unsealed-friday/ar-AA1stUPe?
Dasting AF
I remember
Judge Releases Tranche of Redacted Documents Filed by Special Counsel in Trump Election Case
District of Columbia Judge Tanya Chutkan released a redacted version of the appendix to special counsel Jack Smith’s immunity motion on Oct. 18, offering more insight into the evidence undergirding his prosecution of former President Donald Trump.
So far, the tranche of released evidence consists of four volumes and nearly 1,900 pages, although large portions of the files are sealed or redacted.
Volume I consists of a series of interviews from the House Select Committee on Jan. 6 while Volume II is mostly tweets from the former president.
Volumes III and IV include a lot of publicly available information such as archived webpages from the White House, emails from the Trump–Pence campaign, and press releases.
Other documents from Volume IV show budget and trip details. Another portion contains a redacted version of the special counsel’s report on former White House adviser Peter Navarro’s alleged violation of the Hatch Act.
It came after weeks of dispute over redactions and timing. Chutkan had authorized its release with an Oct. 10 order but delayed the effects of the release for seven days. Trump’s attorneys responded on Oct. 17 with a request to delay the release through Nov. 14, after the presidential election.
The filing containing the request argued that Chutkan should concurrently release both Smith’s and Trump’s evidence appendices. Trump is expected to file his own lengthy immunity brief on Nov. 7. His initial motion to dismiss based on presidential immunity prompted Supreme Court intervention and a subsequent ruling in July that led to Smith filing a superseding indictment.
Smith’s immunity motion, filed on Oct. 2, represents an attempt to claim that the superseding indictment’s allegations don’t fall under any of the immune categories of behavior set up by the Supreme Court’s decision in July.
That decision led to the pre-trial process eventually restarting after months of delay as Trump’s immunity motion made its way through the appellate process.
On Oct. 16, Chutkan also ruled on Trump’s motion to compel various forms of discovery from the prosecution—denying most of the categories of evidence he requested.
Timing Before Election
Chutkan said in her order on Oct. 17 that if she followed Trump’s request to delay the release of Smith’s appendix, she would be engaging in a form of election interference.
“If the court withheld information that the public otherwise had a right to access solely because of the potential political consequences of releasing it, that withholding could itself constitute—or appear to be—election interference,” she said in her five-page order.
“The court will therefore continue to keep political considerations out of its decision-making, rather than incorporating them as Defendant requests.”
It’s unclear how the evidence in Smith’s immunity motion and appendix will impact voters, if at all. Smith has offered copious details of communications among Trump, White House staff, and his campaign around the time of the 2020 presidential election.
Trump, meanwhile, described Smith’s motion as “falsehood-ridden” and alleged the Justice Department violated its policy on avoiding actions that could influence an election.
Trump’s attorneys sought a concurrent release of their appendices to offer a “balanced” picture to voters.
Chutkan rejected this argument, stating on Oct. 17: “Setting aside the oxymoronic proposition that the public’s understanding of this case will be enhanced by withholding information about it, any public debate about the issues in this case has no bearing on the court’s resolution of those issues.”
This is a breaking news story and will be updated.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/judge-releases-tranche-of-redacted-documents-filed-by-special-counsel-in-trump-election-case-5743654
Biden talked about sending some…kek
I just report (YOU) Decide