>>2179414 lb
I postulated not too long ago about the prophecy not having come true even in part yet. I'm fond of the opinion that none of it has begun quite yet.
However, should I be wrong, I could be excited about the events today being indicative of a bear leaving its cave.
Still, I think this has something to do with the silent majority waking up and that something like that hasn't quite happened yet.
actually, fox has been doing quite well for a while now with tucker and hannity
bringing rudy on was a curious but exciting move
unfortunately, however, they're in the process of being bought out by Disney (or so I've heard).
What happened to convincing Jim to ask about Q?
When we mentioned having someone ask, or asking ourselves, "Who is Q?" we weren't doing it to find out who Q was. The questions was to try and get normies to ask the same damn question. Mostly, it was a neuro-linguistic thing - keep repeating the phrase, and get them to google it later.
It was purposed we could measure the success of our reach by noting the search trends that pertained to such a question.
It was ingenious, really.
i'm sincerely not sure what it is you're trying to say here.
man, you shouldn't be having people "verify" things like this for you.
lurk moar
then post
they don't just have mirrors of those servers or emails, anon…
They have access to NSA mirrors on EVERYTHING.
which was talked about quite a bit.
But, many also mentioned the strike in Damascus.
well, hell. I actually haven't seen someone make this connection before.
>but not KILL
the syntax used here makes me think that the "bolt" was meant to kill, but was intercepted, which is precisely what Q mentioned (at least to a degree)
thanks for connecting that, anon
I'm still caught up on the black flag flying above the dome and the belly of the dragon dripping water
although, I'm thinking the one about the dragon is China "standing up" to Trump (trade war shit)
>Two voices will call out in a silence all will here
I'm hoping so hard that this refers to Seth Rich and or Julian Assange. either way, this step had always seemed like it would be really vivid once it does happen
I'm not so sure.
Read what Q is replying to. The link is an article about Qanon.
Most have seemed confident, as I have, about this being the type of question we should convince someone to ask.
The idea was brought up when we were discussing Jim being ousted from the shit going on in Europe right now since Trump is there and Jim "embarrassed" Trump when speaking to/with May. So, we purposed he ask about Q to be able to return to covering the story.
Which is why I and other anons were badgering other anons at the rally in Michigan the other night to yell shit about Q.
We didn't do too poorly.
It might be a good idea to try to push people to find out about Q in this way.
This is why I suggested convincing Jim to ask about Q since we just got news he got told to fuck off after embarrassing the POTUS.
A few breads ago, a memeanon made a post with a meme that tries to convince Jim to ask the question. I think spreading a meme like that would be very beneficial.
I'm always here to help, anon.
and here I was today, speaking with a normie who was just informing me that "your Q thing" is getting bigger on Reddit.
I'm not very surprised that such a story would pop up after they would let them perceive Q's gaining influence.
Isn't it wonderful when she comes to visit us?
I actually thought of that when I first read about that statement from today.
Maybe it was just because of the number being the same though.
Man.. Blue Dream has been treating me very well.
Q is Paul Revere
But, it really doesn't matter who Q is, just rememebr:
>In the hour of darkness and peril and need
>The people will waken and listen to hear
>The hurrying hoof beats of that stead
>And the midnight message of Paul Revere
what time?