Anonymous ID: b3eb46 Oct. 24, 2024, 6:46 a.m. No.21820524   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

KEK. Still laughing my ass off. How he thought he was in a debate and then claimed victory reminded me of 37 years ago. At least I had a secret girlfriend I never even knew about.

Anonymous ID: b3eb46 Oct. 24, 2024, 6:49 a.m. No.21820546   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0571

You know the rules, shills. If you're going to post your MuhJoo then I'll post my favorite memes, no matter than you tried to water them down for the past year and three quarters. Tried, but I'm still fuckin' posting them, aren't I? Bring out your mimic sockpuppets.

Anonymous ID: b3eb46 Oct. 24, 2024, 6:54 a.m. No.21820580   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0591

Hiding behind their broken shield of bigotry, insinuation, and allegation. Now it'll just be the same bullshit scripts used here for over half a decade and talking points from speeches in 1930s Germany, and accusing anyone of being the target of the division narrative if it gets disagreed with. Criticize that narrative too much and clowns will start imitating you to destroy you.

Anonymous ID: b3eb46 Oct. 24, 2024, 7:11 a.m. No.21820697   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>21820599

>The archbishop suggested that โ€œvoting for Kamala Harris,โ€ on the other hand, โ€œis morally inadmissible and constitutes a very grave sin,โ€

>and constitutes a very grave sin

Is he allowed to declare a new sin? Seems like something like that is a little out of his purview, even as an archbishop. I get where he's coming from though, I'm just not happy with how he worded it. I wouldn't consider the uninformed and asleep voting for her a sin, being tricked by evil is not a sin.

Anonymous ID: b3eb46 Oct. 24, 2024, 7:19 a.m. No.21820754   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

KEK. They're whining about posts being removed again. Must really fuck up their expected paycheck or something. "Oh yeah, I'm going to make so much cash, just spammed all my shit andโ€ฆ waitโ€ฆ We'll get you next time BV's! NEXT TIME!"

Anonymous ID: b3eb46 Oct. 24, 2024, 7:24 a.m. No.21820782   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0801

I mean, you know what the BV's remove, shills. You know what they remove and you're deliberately trying to provoke them to create a scene for an isolate and polarize attempt to rally anons to your side. You're not going to turn anons against board staff, clowns.

Anonymous ID: b3eb46 Oct. 24, 2024, 8:04 a.m. No.21821034   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1079

Just go back to imitating me, clowns. It's better than seeing grown middle-aged men whine about not having their propaganda stay published in perpetuity on a small backwater image board. Or has the last shred of integrity fled and now you just cry like little children?

Anonymous ID: b3eb46 Oct. 24, 2024, 8:13 a.m. No.21821091   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1099

>>21821079

I'm not the one running around whining about posts getting removed, trying to rally anons to hate on the staff, or imitating other anons when not posting propaganda. There's no whining when they imitate. I'm just giving them an out to save face. Better luck next time.