>>2181938 (pb)
>>2182069 (pb)
there was a lot of fuckery with the notables during that period, I made noise about it
the same type of 'mistakes' kept happening, couldn't tell if it was the same baker or attempts by different novice bakers that all made the same type of error…
the call for BAKER ID originated with my observations of that period and the inability to tell one baker from another.