Anonymous ID: e23e9a Oct. 27, 2024, 8:29 a.m. No.21840628   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0653 >>0671 >>0715 >>0782 >>0839

>>21840588

>>21840597

 

§ 11.4 Applicable principles of law.

(a) General intent. All actions taken

by the Accused that are necessary for

completion of a crime must be performed with general intent. This intent

is not listed as a separate element.

When the mens rea required for culpability to attach involves an intent that

a particular consequence occur, or

some other specific intent, an intent

element is included. The necessary relationship between such intent element

and the conduct constituting the actus

reus is not articulated for each set of

elements, but is presumed; a nexus between the two is necessary.

(b) The element of wrongfulness and defenses. Conduct must be wrongful to

constitute one of the offenses enumerated herein or any other offense triable

by military commission. Conduct is wrongful if it is done without justification or excuse cognizable under applicable law. The element of wrongfulness

(or the absence of lawful justification

or excuse), which may be required

under the customary law of armed conflict, is not repeated in the elements of

crimes in §11.6. Conduct satisfying the

elements found herein shall be inferred

to be wrongful in the absence of evidence to the contrary. Similarly, this

part does not enunciate defenses that

may apply for specific offenses, though

an Accused is entitled to raise any defense available under the law of armed

conflict. Defenses potentially available

to an Accused under the law of armed

conflict, such as self-defense, mistake

of fact, and duress, may be applicable

to certain offenses subject to trial by

military commission. In the absence of

evidence to the contrary, defenses in

individual cases shall be presumed not

to apply. The burden of going forward

with evidence of lawful justification or

excuse or any applicable defense shall

be upon the Accused. With respect to

the issue of combatant immunity

raised by the specific enumeration of

an element requiring the absence

thereof, the prosecution must affirmatively prove that element regardless of

whether the issue is raised by the defense. Once an applicable defense or an

issue of lawful justification or lawful

excuse is fairly raised by the evidence

presented, except for the defense of

lack of mental responsibility, the burden is on the prosecution to establish

beyond a reasonable doubt that the

conduct was wrongful or that the defense does not apply. With respect to

the defense of lack of mental responsibility, the Accused has the burden of

proving by clear and convincing evidence that, as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, the Accused was

unable to appreciate the nature and

quality of the wrongfulness of the

Accused’s acts. As provided in 32 CFR

9.5(c), the prosecution bears the burden

of establishing the Accused’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in all cases

tried by a military commission. Each

element of an offense enumerated herein must be proven beyond a reasonable

doubt.

 

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2014-title32-vol1/pdf/CFR-2014-title32-vol1-sec11-4.pdf

Anonymous ID: e23e9a Oct. 27, 2024, 8:54 a.m. No.21840749   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>21840486

 

>>21840704

 

And the Darkness of the underworld, that has been in Capricorn since November 2008 this time around…

 

Pluto, In astrology: Pluto is a planet that represents transformation, rebirth, and the underworld

 

We are at the TAIL (kek) end of the Demonic reign.

 

Many astrologers made predictions based on the U.S.A. Pluto return in 2022, but they were all wrong. The actual Pluto return for the U.S.A. is in 2024.

 

The Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776.

The orbital period of Pluto is 248 years.

1776 + 248 = 2024

 

https://astrologyking.com/americas-pluto-return-2024/

 

Q Drops for 1776

https://qalerts.app/?q=1776

Anonymous ID: e23e9a Oct. 27, 2024, 9:04 a.m. No.21840793   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0799 >>0806

>>21840759

May have been a great interview for the normies, but just can't stomach Rogan.

He's to me, the epitome of controlled opposition. His allegiance is and always will be to the dollar.

He goes where it's popular. When he got push back, and lost listeners, he went semi Maga.

Then that rush went to his bank acct.

Kinda cringe to me.