Anonymous ID: 5d9d7d Oct. 27, 2024, 5:24 p.m. No.21844528   šŸ—„ļø.is šŸ”—kun   >>4541 >>4559

>>21844366

Yep

 

UK Snubs Council Of Europe Over Assange Inquiry

by Tyler Durden Sunday, Oct 27, 2024

 

Britainā€™s Home Office is making a "grave mistake" by ignoring a call from the Council of Europe to review its treatment of Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founderā€™s wife has warned. The councilā€™s parliamentary assembly, of which the UK is a member, passed a resolution earlier this month designating Assange as a "political prisoner".

 

Assange endured five years in Belmarsh maximum security prison in London before being released in June, and flying to his native Australia. The UK government had incarcerated him while the U.S. pursued extradition proceedings in the British courts.

 

His treatment has outraged the Council of Europe, which was created in the aftermath of World War II with strong backing from Winston Churchill.

 

Its resolution urged the U.K. authorities to conduct a review ā€œwith a view to establishing whether he [Assange] has been exposed to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, pursuant to their international obligationsā€.

 

It found the U.K. authorities

 

ā€œfailed to effectively protect Mr Assangeā€™s freedom of expression and right to liberty, exposing him to lengthy detention in a high-security prison despite the political nature of the most severe charges against him.ā€

 

Declassified asked Britainā€™s Home Office what its response was to the Council of Europeā€™s call. The government department deflected the question, replying: ā€œThe longstanding extradition request for Julian Assange has been resolved. As is standard practice, all extradition requests are considered on an individual basis by our independent courts and in accordance with U.K. law.ā€

 

The demands of the parliamentary assembly are not binding on European governments but they are ā€œobliged to respondā€.

 

ā€˜Cover-Upā€™

 

Stella Assange, Julianā€™s wife, told Declassified the Home Office is making a ā€œgrave mistakeā€ in refusing to heed the Council of Europeā€™s call. She said:

 

ā€œWe know that the Crown Prosecution Service has disappeared key documents relating to Julianā€™s imprisonment and refused to provide information, first to a journalist, and now to the court, that might shed a light on the political side of Julianā€™s persecution in the U.K..

 

ā€œIt is one thing for rogue elements in the CPS to collude with foreign governments to persecute a publisher and attempt to cover their tracks. It is quite another for the U.K. government to stonewall in this manner in the wake of an independent report by the Council of Europe and a vote by the overwhelming majority of the chamber calling on the U.K. to carry out an investigation.ā€

 

She added:

 

ā€œThe U.K. government is effectively partaking in the cover-up, in a way that only a guilty party would.ā€

 

ā€˜Psychological Tortureā€™

Assangeā€™s detention in maximum security Belmarsh was ā€œout of proportion in relation to his alleged offenceā€, the Council of Europeā€™s resolution found.

 

It recalled the findings of the then United Nations special rapporteur on torture, Nils Melzer, that Assange had been exposed to ā€œprogressively severe forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, the cumulative effects of which can only be described as psychological tortureā€.

 

Melzerā€™s report, produced in 2019 while Assange had secured asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, called on U.K. officials to be investigated for possible ā€œcriminal conductā€ in their treatment of Assange. It was never reported in the U.K. national media.

 

The Council of Europe found that the U.K. authorities ā€œappear to have ignoredā€ Melzerā€™s findings. Its resolution was passed with 88 in favour, 13 against and 20 abstentions. All four U.K. members of the parliamentary assembly voted against, including Lord Richard Keen, a Conservative peer, who expressed a dissenting opinion.

 

ā€˜Chilling Effectā€™

 

The Council of Europe concluded that the treatment of Assange ā€œcreates a dangerous chilling effect and a climate of self-censorship affecting all journalists, publishers and others reporting matters essential for the functioning of a democratic societyā€.

 

It added: ā€œIt severely undermines the role of the press and the protection of journalists and whistle-blowers around the world.ā€

 

The resolution also noted that the Council was ā€œalarmedā€ by reports that the US Central Intelligence Agency had covertly surveyed Assange while he was in the Ecuadorian embassy in London and was allegedly developing plans to poison or even assassinate him on U.K. soil.

 

Rebecca Vincent, campaigns director at Reporters Without Borders, told us that Julian Assangeā€™s sentencing by U.K. courts to 50 weeks in prison for breaking bail was ā€œdisproportionateā€.

 

She added: ā€œHis subsequent prolonged detention in a high-security prison with no charges against him in the U.K., held purely on remand, constituted a gross violation of his rights.ā€

 

More:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/uk-snubs-council-europe-over-assange-inquiry