Anonymous ID: 293f33 Oct. 28, 2024, 5:22 a.m. No.21847034   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>.21846479PB

https://twitter.com/TheMandyGall/status/1850805906579042466

"Kamala is soooooo stupid!

She is so low IQ, equals no Q

equals no qualification to be the president!" Credit to anon from last bread

 

Mandy Gall

@TheMandyGall

 

‘Kamala is sooooooo stupid…you can just stay home….you can not answer any questions…’

 

From Tim Young

3:44 AM · Oct 28, 2024

·626Views

 

This woman says it all: We love Trump from the bottom of our heart because we know, only Trump can save America. Kamala you are not qualified.Best Rant EverAsian people are so truthful and cute.

 

Oct. 28, 2024

https://x.com/TheMandyGall/status/1850805906579042466

Anonymous ID: 293f33 Oct. 28, 2024, 5:27 a.m. No.21847056   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7261

ALX

@alx

 

Lil-X with the MAGA Hat

 

7:26 PM · Oct 27, 2024

·228.6K

Views

 

https://x.com/alx/status/1850680603655426549

 

Elon’s young son sporting the MAGA hat.

Anonymous ID: 293f33 Oct. 28, 2024, 6:42 a.m. No.21847454   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Trump Aide Says Harris Candidacy Was Killed on ‘The View’

David Gardner Fri, October 25, 2024

 

Trump adviser Jason Miller has claimed that an interview with Sunny Hostin on The View might have “killed” Kamala Harris’s chances of winning the White House.

 

Speaking on the ‘Playbook Deep Dive’ podcast, Miller claimed that the vice president’s decision to switch her strategy and embark on a series of media appearances had “backfired.”

 

“Who would have thought that Sunny Hostin from The View really killed Kamala Harris’s candidacy?” said Miller. “But you can make the case that Sunny did.”

 

The veteran aide was referring to a “lay-up” questionfrom the daytime show’s co-host asking Harris if she would do anything differently from President Joe Biden over the past four years.

 

The Democratic Party nominee replied: “There’s not a thing that comes to mind. I’ve been part of most of the decisions that have had impact.”

 

Later in the show, she went back to the question, saying: “You asked me what is the difference between Joe Biden and me. That will be one of the differences. I’m going to have a Republican in my Cabinet.”

 

The Oct. 8 interview was jumped on by MAGA supporters who claimed Harris would bring four more years “of the same failed policies” if she won the election.

 

Miller told podcast host Rachel Blade, a Playbook co-author for Politico,that Hostin wasn’t posing “a trick question.”

 

“She still can’t answer it,” he said, “and I think voters are a lot smarter than many in the media give them credit for being. Voters can pick up on that, like, wait, you can’t name one single thing that you would do differently from Joe Biden?

 

“We’re about three full weeks of being unable to answer that one singular question. I think that’s pretty damning.”

 

He continued: “I don’t know what’s going on in Harris world. I don’t know if it’s the Obama people fighting with the Biden people, fighting with the Harris people, fighting with the Labour Brits that they imported in.”

 

At a CNN Town Hall, Harris insisted her administration would not be Biden 2.0. “My administration will not be a continuation of the Biden administration,” she said. “I bring to this role my own ideas and my own experience. I represent a new generation of leadership on a number of issues and believe that we have to actually take new approaches.”

 

Miller insisted that the GOP campaign strategy of allowing Donald Trump to express his personality with a relentless schedule of mainstream and sometimes unusual media appearances was paying off.

 

He added that it was “really telling” that Harris hadn’t done a “real press conference.”

 

https://news.yahoo.com/news/trump-aide-view-co-host-160404574.html

Anonymous ID: 293f33 Oct. 28, 2024, 6:45 a.m. No.21847474   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7484 >>7563

David Sacks

@DavidSacks

 

The major broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, NBC) operate on free licenses of public spectrum in exchange for requirements to serve the public interest. They no longer do, and this is an obsolete model anyway.The spectrum should be auctioned off, with the proceeds used to pay down the national debt. Of course, the networks can bid on the spectrum, and they will win if broadcast networks are still the most highly valued use.

 

What’s more likely to happen is that valuable spectrum will be reapportioned to the next generation of wireless applications, unleashing many more interesting options for consumers and businesses.The networks can continue to operate on cable, like hundreds of other redundant channels.

 

4:45 PM · Oct 26, 2024

·24.5M

Views

 

Sachs just revealed Trump's statement is a goal for 47

 

https://x.com/DavidSacks/status/1850277560816681255

Anonymous ID: 293f33 Oct. 28, 2024, 7 a.m. No.21847536   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7547 >>7611 >>7675

Washington Post halts presidential endorsements, sending shock waves through the newsroom and beyond

By IRIE SENTNER and ANDREW HOWARD 10/25/2024, 7:40PM ET.1/2

 

The Washington Post on Friday announced it will no longer endorse presidential candidates, breaking decades of tradition in a move that immediately garnered fierce backlash from both employees and outside critics.

 

At least one editor has already resigned, and the paper’s legendary former top editor Marty Baron publicly rebuked the move as an act of “cowardice.”

 

The Post is the second major newspaper this week to punt on a presidential endorsement, following a similar decision by the Los Angeles Times on Wednesday at the instruction of its billionaire owner, Patrick Soon-Shiong, that led to the resignation of the editorials editor and multiple staffers.

 

In a note published to the paper’s websiteannouncing the move, Washington Post publisher Will Lewis called it a “statement in support of our readers’ ability to make up their own minds,” writing that it would help the publication focus on “nonpartisan news for all Americans” from the newsroom and “thought-provoking, reported views from our opinion team to help our readers make up their own minds.”

 

“We recognize that this will be read in a range of ways, including as a tacit endorsement of one candidate, or as a condemnation of another, or as an abdication of responsibility,” Lewis added. “That is inevitable. We don’t see it that way.”

 

The Post’s newsroom and editorial team erupted in outrage. Robert Kagan, a neoconservative columnist and editor at large at the Post, resigned in response, he confirmed in a statement to POLITICO. A spokesperson for the Post declined to comment on Kagan’s resignation.

 

David Maraniss, a 46-year veteran reporter at the paper, publicly called the move“contemptible,” writing in a social media post:“Today is the bleakest day of my journalism career.”

 

And on Friday evening, nine of the paper’s opinion columnists published a scathing dissent of the decision, calling it “a terrible mistake” that “represents an abandonment of the fundamental editorial convictions of the newspaper that we love, and for which we have worked a combined 228 years.”

 

“There is no contradiction between The Post’s important role as an independent newspaper and its practice of making political endorsements, both as a matter of guidance to readers and as a statement of core beliefs,” the columnists wrote. “That has never been more true than in the current campaign.”

 

"Welp, that's certainly a new type of October Surprise,”Ashley Parker, a senior national political correspondent for the Post, wrote on X.

 

In a statement, the newspaper's union attributed the decision to billionaire owner Jeff Bezos and said the move "undercuts the work of our members at a time when we should be building our readers’ trust, not losing it."

 

"The message from our chief executive, Will Lewis — not from the Editorial Board itself — makes us concerned that management interfered with the work of our members in Editorial," the union wrote.

 

"According to our own reporters and Guild members, an endorsement for Harris was already drafted, and the decision to not to publish was made by The Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos."

 

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/10/25/2024-elections-live-coverage-updates-analysis/washington-post-endorsements-2024-00185545

Anonymous ID: 293f33 Oct. 28, 2024, 7:02 a.m. No.21847547   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7611 >>7675

>>21847536

2/2

A person close to the decision granted anonymity to discuss it told POLITICO that the decision was made within the Post and did not come from Bezos.

 

But others were quick to point the finger at Bezos.

Baron, who was executive editor from 2012 until his retirement in 2021, called the move “cowardice, with democracy as its casualty,” writing on X that Donald Trump “will see this as an invitation to further intimidate” Bezos and others.

 

“Disturbing spinelessness at an institution famed for courage,” Baron wrote.

 

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said in an X postthat the move “is what Oligarchy is about.” “Jeff Bezos, the 2nd wealthiest person in the world and the owner of the Washington Post, overrides his editorial board and refuses to endorse Kamala,” Sanders wrote. “Clearly, he is afraid of antagonizing Trump and losing Amazon’s federal contracts. Pathetic.”

 

Lewis’ announcement comes months after the publisher made headlines over bombshell reports alleging that he played a role in a phone hacking scandal while he was an editor at the Sunday Times, an accusation he denies. Lewis had clashed over the scandal with the Post’s then-top editor, Sally Buzbee, who reportedly wanted to cover it.

 

Buzbee and other staffers at the Post also conflicted with Lewis over an organizational overhaul he introduced to split the publication’s newsroom and opinion team into three smaller divisions. Buzbee left the Post in June. Robert Winnett, who was also allegedly involved in the hacking scandal, was originally set to replace Buzbee but withdrew from the position amid the controversy.

 

The Post has endorsed a presidential candidate in every election since 1992, after choosing neither candidate in the 1988 election.

 

But Lewis emphasized that the decision is “returning to our roots,” citing an editorial board piece from 1960, when the paper chose not to endorse a presidential candidate after supporting Dwight Eisenhower in the 1952 race.

 

“In the light of hindsight we retain the view that the arguments for his nomination and election were compelling,” the board wrote at the time.“But hindsight also has convinced us that it might have been wiser for an independent newspaper in the Nation's Capital to have avoided formal endorsement.”

 

In 1976, the paper again switched gears to endorse Jimmy Carter. But Lewis said “we had it right before that, and this is what we are going back to.”

 

“Most of all, our job as the newspaper of the capital city of the most important country in the world is to be independent,” Lewis wrote. “And that is what we are and will be.”

 

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/10/25/2024-elections-live-coverage-updates-analysis/washington-post-endorsements-2024-00185545

 

They got the message from Trump, be fake news and die, or turn back to real journalism and real news. They and others have been propaganda outlets for a long time. It's not journalism because they have broken every rule of journalism for decades.

Anonymous ID: 293f33 Oct. 28, 2024, 7:06 a.m. No.21847565   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7584 >>7611 >>7675

CBS 60 Minutes Implies President Trump is Going to Win – Begin Proactive Sympathetic Deportation Narrative

 

October 27, 2024 | Sundance

CBS’ 60 Minutes ran a lengthy outline earlier this evening consisting of questions to former Acting ICE Director Tom Homan about how President Trump will deport millions of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris’s illegal aliens. [Article with Video Here]

 

The sympathetic CBS framework is essentially what you would expect: (1) the illegal aliens are earnest people, part of a poor huddled mass; and (2) there’s no humanitarian way to deport millions of them. [Video Segment] Tom Homan does a great job dispatching the narrative engineers of CBS.

 

There were an estimated 11 million illegal aliens in 2006. According to CBS the current number of illegal aliens is still 11 million. That’s their story and they are sticking to it.

 

VIA CBS – […] The American Immigration Council estimated that it could cost $88 billion annually to deport one million people a year. The removal of millions of construction, hospitality and agriculture workers could reduce the U.S. gross domestic product by $1.7 trillion.

 

Tom Homan, who led U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement during the first Trump administration, said he doesn’t know if the $88 billion a year cost estimate is accurate, but he says mass deportation is necessary.

 

“What price do you put on national security? Is it worth it?” Homan said. (read more)

 

Now, let’s cut this elephant into bite sized morsels to explain just how a deportation process can work. First, you cut off all funding. Next, you present two policy options:

 

(1) Leave and reapply, for expedited consideration… or (2) stay, wait to get deported and then be subsequently barred from ever having the opportunity in the future.

 

Watch the self-deportation begin.

 

The enforcement mechanism has a 60-day period before beginning.

 

♦ For those who choose to self-deport, at the exit port they receive a biometric scan (same as current CPB/INS visa system) that registers them for expedited consideration in their home country. Only with the exit registration is the alien eligible for expedited consideration.

 

♦ For those who refuse to leave, as the employment eligibility system, criminal justice system and current Immigration and Naturalization Service laws are enforced and utilized to identify them. They are picked-up, deported and also receive a biometric scan that registers them as permanently disqualified from legal reentry.

 

Those who self-deport are the generally the registered aliens we would want to permit to hold legal reentry eligibility status. Those who refuse to self-deport are generally going to be the ones we would not want to hold legal eligibility status.

 

The cost of the USA deportation expense is covered by placing a 5% surcharge on all money services, outbound financial transfersand remittances via Western Union etc, to Mexico, Central and South America. These transfers of cash are called “remittances”. It is a simple proposal to use a Money Services Compliance action, via the U.S. Treasury (Banking Services and Secrecy Act), that would force a Western Union affidavit (or other institution) to be completed prior to the transfer.

 

The Money Services Compliance Affidavit simply requires the sender present valid ID and fill out a form prior to the transfer which identifies the sender as a legally authorized entity within the U.S. An identical system has been in place for decades for financial services and money transfers sent to Cuba, a Cuban Remittance Affidavit.

 

The process is well known in the banking and money services industry and is nothing more than a swearing of legality, along with documentation to verify (state issued ID), by the originating entity. For Cuban remittances there are also maximum amounts allowable for transfer.

 

President Trump previously pondered a similar finance mechanism for the U.S. southern border wall.

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/10/27/cbs-60-minutes-implies-president-trump-is-going-to-win-begin-proactive-sympathetic-deportation-narrative/

Anonymous ID: 293f33 Oct. 28, 2024, 7:11 a.m. No.21847584   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7594 >>7611 >>7675

>>21847565

Here's the video

60 Minutes

@60Minutes

 

Cecilia Vega asks: “Is there a way to carry out mass deportation without separating families?”

 

“Of course there is. Families can be deported together,” says Tom Homan, head of ICE during Trump’s family separation policy.

https://cbsn.ws/4fixO5w

 

8:02 PM · Oct 27, 2024

·5.2M

Views

https://x.com/60Minutes/status/1850689458590384212

 

0:30