how long before the 'why do you keep deleting my posts, Q has his trip code blocked' shill posts?
Q still has a board all to himself.
how long before the 'why do you keep deleting my posts, Q has his trip code blocked' shill posts?
Q still has a board all to himself.
https://8kun.top/projectdcomms/res/20.html
explain what you mean? I mentioned that Q has his own board and I gave a link to the bread that is in it. Why is that bad and how is your comment useful?
useless shill you add nothing.
the inane idea that it is a 'birthday' is a shill creation.
how is a first post a 'birthday?'
maybe call it an 'anniversary'
you have no idea who Q is so you have no idea what Q's birthday is.
maybe call it an anniversary?
posts are not 'birthed'.
you're a shill trying to slide and be stupid and talk like a mush brain so people will imitate you.
Q hasn't posted and isn't going to post.
what, exactly, are you celebrating?
an anniversary.
so call it that and stop using the wrong words.
I doubt you care, you keep IP hopping.
I should have said 'isn't going to post tonight and probably not until DJT is back in office, if ever.'
it IP hops and does the 'annoyance troll' thing.
is it your birthday? if so happy birthday.
it's probably NOT Q's birthday. There is a 1/365.25 chance that it is actually Q's birthday.
why say Birthday?
what purpose to make 'anniversary' into 'birthday'?
what is your real purpose?
it's the same team that inanely posts 'GM' and why don't you like people saying 'good morning' like jerks everyday.
and do a jerk-fest of mocking the anons .
or like the ones who call you 'rabbi' over and over if you mention how Israel needs reformation and should ban Apartheid.
they think they are some how upsetting anon but they are just trying to cause distress, which they fail to do.
it only shows how they are like a swarm of flies only here to cause stupid reactions and try to train people to say dumb stuff, like calling an anniversary a birthday, which it is not.
the not calling it a Q post unless the Q was the name happened right around the same time that Q was called a newfag.
the reason people knew it was Q was by ID.
Q asked people to 'find the roll' about pictures on a cell phone at the SOTU address, all the 'times up' pins, and then the train crash the next day!
the night the rocket went into the building in Nashville and then there was a very quick news blackout about it.
When POTUS's plane was shot at by a rockett!
When Kappy 'jumped from the bridge' but probably didn't really.
When eeryone made fun of 'chat logs'
when anjel almost cried
Those late nights when suddenly the board would be filled up with Military crews (operators) posting stuff about their teams in a flood and then suddenly Q would post!
When 'strange kerning' revealled fuckery in PDF files.
When Q+ or Q++ would post!
Whenever Dan posted!
looking for Orcas in Pudget sound
>>21851356
what if you stopped pretending that the Jews do everything in unison?
what if you stopped collectivising the bad stuff of a few for the behavior of all?
what if you actually could love Jews instead of always talking ill of them?
what if you stood down and befriended some Jews and saw what is lovable about them?
when you speak hateful and bigoted things and expect a response, when you constantly talk ill of some group, when you slander and accuse people without cause, when you blame them for stuff that isn't even true, then you create a situation where people filter you.
that filter is them censoring you from their thoughts. They cut you out and innore your idiocy.
if you want to end that censorship, then what you do is stop the hateful smack-talk.
simple
you are the cause of yourself being censored when you persist in hateful smack-talking.
Happy First Q-day, anon!
I didn't een mention Jews in my post.
that theory applies to any and all smack-talking.
I am now going to do the obvious and ignore your smack talking.
you are the cause of yourself being censored.
Irrational hatred and bigotry is very sad, isn't it?
>>21851436
I suppose that there are perhaps some sad people because of you, anon.
and some of them are Jews, no doubt.
you might be someone worth knowing aside from the wart on your soul of being a hater as you are.
leave the Judgement to Jesus, anon.
you're doing the 'crimes of the few are to be used to blame the whole group' bit.
I never said that some people might do bad stuff, in any group that is true.
and I don't romanticize them, but merely point out that most of them are pretty awesome and worth being friends with.
PS: some of the victims of bad people are the people of their own families or tribes.
instead of 'I never said that some people might do bad stuff' . . . I should have said
I never denied that some of the people might do bad stuff
call it 'first Q post day' or something other than 'birthday', can you.
PS: Cats are not Kosher either.
>>21851465
no evidence is eer provided by the ones who slander here. All they do is go on with bigoted statements and bullying.