We aren't exposing any pedophiles, that has nothing to do with our function. It's a non-sequitur question that shows he is confused about what Q is.
The fact that you are entertaining his question shows you don't know enough about Q to be arguing with anyone.
If you have fuck you money, why the were you living with a crazy liberal family?
Just realize that this would have been the reaction literally no matter how the meeting went.
It would have been exactly the same, they've just been waiting for this chance to grandstand.
I went to the that sub once and read a few posts.
Every thread is everyone long and slow stroking each other off about how brilliant they are and how important their work is etc etc.
It's basically what this place would turn into if middling-IQ people were allowed to namefag and form faggy little followings full of people even dumber than they are.
It's notable because it's a possibility we never considered before and seems plausible, not because it's a confirmation.
She wasn't a honey pot, she was a sharp DOJ asset that PS, a lifelong clown, set out to comp and use.
She probably has since realized she was the mark and being played.
Hence, PS comes in first and they get him on record lying about everything.
Then they bring in the spurned LP who was used, and she is "much more helpful" and truthful, contradicting everything PS just said.
PS knew the game from the beginning, and is still playing it.
LP got in over her head and is willing to speak freely at this point.
Sure, I'm just guessing after all, the reverse could be possible.
But if I had to pick a lifelong counter-intel pro as being the one being used, or a idealistic DOJ lawyer, the latter seems more likely.
Also the fact that he is still lying through his teeth and she is talking implies that he has more to lose, because he is involved at a deeper level.