>>21865869
So how long do we have to wait for possession and distribution of child pornography to be legal?
>>21865869
So how long do we have to wait for possession and distribution of child pornography to be legal?
Not a shill. So how many anons are going to be prosecuted for downloading Hunter Biden's laptop then? It's not legally safe to use any digital technology or run any kind of forum independently after these laws were introduced. Anyone can hand you a flash drive with child porn, hack your computer, or even a stack of papers. If you end up on the wrong website you can get nailed too. You can't collect evidence on the cabal because they all have child porn on their computers. You have to rely on the government they control and Hunter Biden proved how well that works. You also have innocent teenagers running afoul of such laws. People shouldn't have to live in fear of the government every time they interact with modern technology. I doubt the founding fathers would have approved of such laws.
Or in short, making information, or a collection of 1s and 0s unilaterally illegal is a bad idea.
I'm not suggesting it shouldn't be illegal in the right circumstances. But I think the current laws are shit and it's an unnecessary source of stress for anyone who is knowledgeable about them and uses modern technology. Should people live in constant fear of the government if they create a forum online if they can't afford to have people filter images 24/7? Or going to websites not owned by a large corporation? Or accepting a data storage device from someone?
It was only for people who want to restore America to the principles it was founded on so it might not apply to you.