TYB!
And yet, Blacks wonder why they're stereotyped….
>there are statutes against sporting partisan gear in some states.
Those statutes don't allow poll works to act a fool and strike a person out of anger.
>She felt threatened.
Kek. That's not how self-defense works, Anon. Doesn't matter who threw the first punch (or in this case, slap), the Law is explicit in that the first person to strike is the aggressor.
>She felt threatened.
He's guilty by being White, Anon. That's why the rest shielded the assaulter. They knew she was in the wrong, but Tribal affiliations™ prevailed, which is something White people are prohibited from doing. The woman hit the man [knowingly]. She knew she would get away with it and not face consequences for her actions.
In order for an attack to be criminal, there are two actions required: was it intentional and was there causation. If the attack was intentional, it's considered "assault." If the causation of an altercation resulted in physical attack, it is considered "battery." There's no state that has a definitive "mutual combat" law on the books and it doesn't matter how "threatened™" she felt, the woman committed battery and should be charged as such.
Legal definition of battery is as follows:
What is "battery"?
"Battery" in civil court is unwanted physical contact, physical violence, or physical control of a person. For the contact to qualify as "battery," it must be harmful or offensive to the plaintiff. But the wrongdoer does not have to have intended to offend or injure the plaintiff. Rather, they just have to have made contact with them.