Drop 788 "Thoughts of the [current] President of the United States…
Yeah, PedoJoe TOO!
It was a Slam on White People.
White Trash.
Tell me again, who the real Racists are?
What Race was REALLY being Targeted this ENTIRE TIME?
Should FEEL SHAME?
Yeah… that was the "Garbage" Joe was talking about…
The Mother, Dressed in Blood Red, handing her Child over, DRESSED LIKE A CHICKEN, (code) to a PEDOPHILE.
Wakey, Wakey, White Hats took a lot of work setting up the scene, that most are still sleeping through.
Doesn't Boulder have that Satanic Statue at the Airport? And all the underground tunnels?
Is UTAH the hub of trafficking?
Thought the Speaker is 3rd in control of the voting issues, when the VP can't do it.
The 12th Amendment to the Constitution requires that presidential and vice presidential candidates
gain “a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed” in order to win election. With a total
of 538 electors representing the 50 states and the District of Columbia, 270 electoral votes is the
“magic number,” the arithmetic majority necessary to win the presidency.
What would happen if no candidate won a majority of electoral votes? In these circumstances, ==the
12
th Amendment also provides that the House of Representatives would elect the President, and
the Senate would elect the Vice President, in a procedure known as “contingent election.”==
Contingent election has been implemented twice in the nation’s history under the 12th
Amendment: first, to elect the President in 1825, and second, the Vice President in 1837.
In a contingent election, the House would choose among the three candidates who received the
most electoral votes. Each state, regardless of population, casts a single vote for President in a
contingent election. Representatives of states with two or more Representatives would therefore
need to conduct an internal poll within their state delegation to decide which candidate would
receive the state’s single vote. A majority of state votes, 26 or more, is required to elect, and the
House must vote “immediately” and “by ballot.” Additional precedents exist from 1825, but they
would not be binding on the House in a contemporary election. In a contingent election, the
Senate elects the Vice President, choosing one of the two candidates who received the most
electoral votes. Each Senator casts a single vote, and the votes of a majority of the whole Senate,
51 or more, are necessary to elect. The District of Columbia, which is not a state, would not
participate in a contingent election, despite the fact that it casts three electoral votes.
Although contingent election has been implemented only once each for President and Vice
President since the 12th Amendment was ratified, the failure to win an electoral college majority is
a potential outcome in any presidential election. Some examples include an election closely
contested by two major candidates, one in which one or more third-party or independent
candidacies might win a portion of the electoral vote, or one involving defections by a significant
number of so-called “faithless” electors.
A contingent election would be conducted by a newly elected Congress, immediately following
the joint congressional session that counts and certifies electoral votes. This session is set by law
for January 6 of the year following the presidential election, but is occasionally rescheduled. If
the House is unable to elect a President by the January 20 inauguration day, the 20th Amendment
provides that the Vice President-elect would act as President until the impasse is resolved. If
neither a President nor Vice President has been chosen by inauguration day, the Presidential
Succession Act applies, under which the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the President
pro tempore of the Senate, or a Cabinet officer, in that order, would act as President until a
President or Vice President qualifies.
A contingent election would require Congress to consider and discharge functions of great
constitutional significance, which could be complicated by a protracted and contentious political
struggle that might stem from an electoral college deadlock. This report provides an examination
of constitutional requirements and historical precedents associated with contingent election. It
also identifies and evaluates contemporary issues that might emerge in the modern context.
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R40504/7
Well, perhaps, none of "THESE" laws are even valid, IF we are under ML control?
Aren't we technically "still at war?"
Didn't Trump activate that during Covid?
Gotta dig on Mil Law for Elections and see…
KEK and LOOK, its already been discussed on, YOU GUESSED IT… CFuckingR
KEK!
What Are the Laws Governing Military Force During U.S. Elections?
The prospect of a contested U.S. presidential election has spurred concerns about militias appearing at voting locations. State and federal laws have strict guidelines for any deployment of forces at polls or to quell election violence, but worries persist.
The November 3 U.S. elections occur against the backdrop of a resurgent coronavirus pandemic and heavily divisive politics. With preelection voting at unprecedented levels, President Donald J. Trump has repeatedly criticized the integrity of voting procedures and caused many to speculate whether a peaceful transition of power can be assured if he loses the election. These circumstances have heightened concerns about a disputed vote count, violence, and whether federal forces—possibly joined by unorganized militias—will be deployed to enforce law and order.
States have authority over running elections, but what is their power to regulate armed forces if election-related violence breaks out?
More From Our Experts
Jonathan Panter
Missile Defense: How Vulnerable Is Israel to Iran’s Attacks?
Stephen Biddle
Evaluating the U.S. Military Contribution in Afghanistan
Richard K. Betts
Video Brief: Defense
States have legal authority to respond to election-related violence. At the most local level, municipal officials would typically use city police to deter or quell violence. Regardless of the sufficiency of local efforts, the governor can act under state constitutional and statutory authority to deploy state law enforcement personnel, such as highway troopers, and the state National Guard.
More on:
Transition 2021
Military Operations
Elections and Voting
Election 2020
United States
Each of the fifty states has a National Guard contingent that the governors can call to serve during emergencies, typically natural disasters, and for law enforcement purposes, as they have done throughout history. National Guard members are individuals with civilian jobs who can be activated as trained and uniformed soldiers.
By June 2, in response to protests over police brutality against Black people, governors had deployed seventeen thousand state National Guard members to assist local law enforcement personnel in twenty-three states.
Yet their armed deployment covers a limited scope of actions. If a governor were to order the deployment of armed National Guard members to interfere with the right to vote under the pretense of deterring violence—such as by breaking up long lines of voters before or on Election Day—that action could trigger unrest and would be challenged immediately in the courts as unconstitutional conduct under both state and federal law. However, it was perfectly legal during the 2020 primaries when governors activated unarmed, plainclothes Guard members to serve in polling places to facilitate the voting process. Additionally, thirty states have now called upon the National Guard to bolster cybersecurity for the general election.
moar
gotta digg moar here, since it's really THEIR fuckery that we're dealing with.
https://www.cfr.org/article/what-are-laws-governing-military-force-during-us-elections
>Martial Law requires one of three components, in order to be activated (temporarily) over civilian government and the suspension of habeas corpus.
Red Envelope
"We are an Occupied Country"
Law PRE-LIFTED…
The truth is BEHIND YOU…
(already activated. you're watching a movie)